The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
El Blokey. The man. The myth. The legend. The user that has won more GADs than all but 11 of you. As of now, his SR awards tally looks like this:
1. Mos**t overrated pos**ter: 3
2. Mos**t audacious moronic spas**tic: 2
3. Funnies**t pos**ter: 2*
4. Review King: 2
5. Bitchies**t forum member: 5****
(* indicates a shared vote)
1. Mos**t overrated pos**ter. A category only worthwhile if your choice is obvious, or explained. At the very leas**t MoJoJoJo tried to summarize why El Blokey was overrated: mos**t of his pos**ts have been done before. But MoJoJoJo is bitter because he showed me SR and now he has no time for it, leaving the gate wide open for me to overtake him in all SR-related areas. But I am s**till indebted to him. Cubis**t's nomination does not surprise me (more later in numbers 2 and 5), but Rickoss'…Rickoss' does. I am perplexed. He seems like a nice kid. Why the animosity? And more importantly - who 'rates' me anyway, aside from DW my boy-slave?
2. The problem with this award is that the name alone shows the idiocy of its creator. Audacious is not a derogatory term, and the use of spas**tic as one such word is extremely inappropriate, although perhaps not on a par with 'gaylord'. The two votes come from sources close to home: MoJoJoJo, my SR big brother who only gave me the nomination because he felt he'd given me all the others, he may as well give me this. Cubis**t also decided I was audaciously moronic enough to warrant a vote…but his judgement was no doubt clouded by the seven shades of sh*t I always kick out of him during our lively debates on SR. Metaphorically speaking.
3. MoJoJoJo showed his true colours when voting for myself and SHEEPY - his tas**te of humour is bes**t served when belittling others, and because I am always there to try and point out those little spots in the gene pool where people have decided to relieve themselves so that others are not fouled by the urine, I feel I have earned a vote for being funny. And, as mentioned before, DW does as I say. Or he gets the belt.
4. 2 votes? 2 right. Har har. Around 12 review GADs. Who's the daddy?
5. A runaway winner. Always ready for a debate, I have breathed Life into Chat in an attempt to get rid of all the crappy spam. Some see my efforts to get idiots to pos**t MOVIE topics in the MOVIE forum as courageous…others, futile. Some, like Mys**tique, mock…but she is a s**tupid girl. 5 votes, three shared with Cubis**t (my favourite verbal punchbag) and one with Kyz, who doesn't really whine anymore now that nobody else wins GAD1.
And there, it ends. Not with a bang, but a whimper. Well, not with a whimper, but with a sentence.
This one.
1. Mos**t overrated pos**ter: 3
2. Mos**t audacious moronic spas**tic: 2
3. Funnies**t pos**ter: 2*
4. Review King: 2
5. Bitchies**t forum member: 5****
(* indicates a shared vote)
1. Mos**t overrated pos**ter. A category only worthwhile if your choice is obvious, or explained. At the very leas**t MoJoJoJo tried to summarize why El Blokey was overrated: mos**t of his pos**ts have been done before. But MoJoJoJo is bitter because he showed me SR and now he has no time for it, leaving the gate wide open for me to overtake him in all SR-related areas. But I am s**till indebted to him. Cubis**t's nomination does not surprise me (more later in numbers 2 and 5), but Rickoss'…Rickoss' does. I am perplexed. He seems like a nice kid. Why the animosity? And more importantly - who 'rates' me anyway, aside from DW my boy-slave?
2. The problem with this award is that the name alone shows the idiocy of its creator. Audacious is not a derogatory term, and the use of spas**tic as one such word is extremely inappropriate, although perhaps not on a par with 'gaylord'. The two votes come from sources close to home: MoJoJoJo, my SR big brother who only gave me the nomination because he felt he'd given me all the others, he may as well give me this. Cubis**t also decided I was audaciously moronic enough to warrant a vote…but his judgement was no doubt clouded by the seven shades of sh*t I always kick out of him during our lively debates on SR. Metaphorically speaking.
3. MoJoJoJo showed his true colours when voting for myself and SHEEPY - his tas**te of humour is bes**t served when belittling others, and because I am always there to try and point out those little spots in the gene pool where people have decided to relieve themselves so that others are not fouled by the urine, I feel I have earned a vote for being funny. And, as mentioned before, DW does as I say. Or he gets the belt.
4. 2 votes? 2 right. Har har. Around 12 review GADs. Who's the daddy?
5. A runaway winner. Always ready for a debate, I have breathed Life into Chat in an attempt to get rid of all the crappy spam. Some see my efforts to get idiots to pos**t MOVIE topics in the MOVIE forum as courageous…others, futile. Some, like Mys**tique, mock…but she is a s**tupid girl. 5 votes, three shared with Cubis**t (my favourite verbal punchbag) and one with Kyz, who doesn't really whine anymore now that nobody else wins GAD1.
And there, it ends. Not with a bang, but a whimper. Well, not with a whimper, but with a sentence.
This one.
Page:
Rickoss wrote:
> Heh, sorry BlokeMeistro (Change your name, so you can mock those who
> use El ;-)).
He could always become Swander87 again...
> Heh, sorry BlokeMeistro (Change your name, so you can mock those who
> use El ;-)).
He could always become Swander87 again...
Heh, sorry BlokeMeistro (Change your name, so you can mock those who use El ;-)).
I couldn't really think of many users and your Jay & Silent Bob review... I just didn't like it. Even though it was funny in parts, I didn't find it as engrossing as many and it didn't tell me to keep reading it. Since it won GAD, I see that as overrated.
Having said that, some of my reviews that have won...
*Sigh*
I couldn't really think of many users and your Jay & Silent Bob review... I just didn't like it. Even though it was funny in parts, I didn't find it as engrossing as many and it didn't tell me to keep reading it. Since it won GAD, I see that as overrated.
Having said that, some of my reviews that have won...
*Sigh*
It was much better than the one about gerrid.
Much better.
Much better.
Heh, you stuck to your word mate.
Amusingly done.
Good stuff.
Amusingly done.
Good stuff.
El Blokey. The man. The myth. The legend. The user that has won more GADs than all but 11 of you. As of now, his SR awards tally looks like this:
1. Mos**t overrated pos**ter: 3
2. Mos**t audacious moronic spas**tic: 2
3. Funnies**t pos**ter: 2*
4. Review King: 2
5. Bitchies**t forum member: 5****
(* indicates a shared vote)
1. Mos**t overrated pos**ter. A category only worthwhile if your choice is obvious, or explained. At the very leas**t MoJoJoJo tried to summarize why El Blokey was overrated: mos**t of his pos**ts have been done before. But MoJoJoJo is bitter because he showed me SR and now he has no time for it, leaving the gate wide open for me to overtake him in all SR-related areas. But I am s**till indebted to him. Cubis**t's nomination does not surprise me (more later in numbers 2 and 5), but Rickoss'…Rickoss' does. I am perplexed. He seems like a nice kid. Why the animosity? And more importantly - who 'rates' me anyway, aside from DW my boy-slave?
2. The problem with this award is that the name alone shows the idiocy of its creator. Audacious is not a derogatory term, and the use of spas**tic as one such word is extremely inappropriate, although perhaps not on a par with 'gaylord'. The two votes come from sources close to home: MoJoJoJo, my SR big brother who only gave me the nomination because he felt he'd given me all the others, he may as well give me this. Cubis**t also decided I was audaciously moronic enough to warrant a vote…but his judgement was no doubt clouded by the seven shades of sh*t I always kick out of him during our lively debates on SR. Metaphorically speaking.
3. MoJoJoJo showed his true colours when voting for myself and SHEEPY - his tas**te of humour is bes**t served when belittling others, and because I am always there to try and point out those little spots in the gene pool where people have decided to relieve themselves so that others are not fouled by the urine, I feel I have earned a vote for being funny. And, as mentioned before, DW does as I say. Or he gets the belt.
4. 2 votes? 2 right. Har har. Around 12 review GADs. Who's the daddy?
5. A runaway winner. Always ready for a debate, I have breathed Life into Chat in an attempt to get rid of all the crappy spam. Some see my efforts to get idiots to pos**t MOVIE topics in the MOVIE forum as courageous…others, futile. Some, like Mys**tique, mock…but she is a s**tupid girl. 5 votes, three shared with Cubis**t (my favourite verbal punchbag) and one with Kyz, who doesn't really whine anymore now that nobody else wins GAD1.
And there, it ends. Not with a bang, but a whimper. Well, not with a whimper, but with a sentence.
This one.
1. Mos**t overrated pos**ter: 3
2. Mos**t audacious moronic spas**tic: 2
3. Funnies**t pos**ter: 2*
4. Review King: 2
5. Bitchies**t forum member: 5****
(* indicates a shared vote)
1. Mos**t overrated pos**ter. A category only worthwhile if your choice is obvious, or explained. At the very leas**t MoJoJoJo tried to summarize why El Blokey was overrated: mos**t of his pos**ts have been done before. But MoJoJoJo is bitter because he showed me SR and now he has no time for it, leaving the gate wide open for me to overtake him in all SR-related areas. But I am s**till indebted to him. Cubis**t's nomination does not surprise me (more later in numbers 2 and 5), but Rickoss'…Rickoss' does. I am perplexed. He seems like a nice kid. Why the animosity? And more importantly - who 'rates' me anyway, aside from DW my boy-slave?
2. The problem with this award is that the name alone shows the idiocy of its creator. Audacious is not a derogatory term, and the use of spas**tic as one such word is extremely inappropriate, although perhaps not on a par with 'gaylord'. The two votes come from sources close to home: MoJoJoJo, my SR big brother who only gave me the nomination because he felt he'd given me all the others, he may as well give me this. Cubis**t also decided I was audaciously moronic enough to warrant a vote…but his judgement was no doubt clouded by the seven shades of sh*t I always kick out of him during our lively debates on SR. Metaphorically speaking.
3. MoJoJoJo showed his true colours when voting for myself and SHEEPY - his tas**te of humour is bes**t served when belittling others, and because I am always there to try and point out those little spots in the gene pool where people have decided to relieve themselves so that others are not fouled by the urine, I feel I have earned a vote for being funny. And, as mentioned before, DW does as I say. Or he gets the belt.
4. 2 votes? 2 right. Har har. Around 12 review GADs. Who's the daddy?
5. A runaway winner. Always ready for a debate, I have breathed Life into Chat in an attempt to get rid of all the crappy spam. Some see my efforts to get idiots to pos**t MOVIE topics in the MOVIE forum as courageous…others, futile. Some, like Mys**tique, mock…but she is a s**tupid girl. 5 votes, three shared with Cubis**t (my favourite verbal punchbag) and one with Kyz, who doesn't really whine anymore now that nobody else wins GAD1.
And there, it ends. Not with a bang, but a whimper. Well, not with a whimper, but with a sentence.
This one.
Page: