The "Nintendo Games" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
NGC is much better then NOM because you get more information about games on the GC and GBA and you get a video in one of the issues and NOM do not even know about Mario Advance two yet.
Page:
Call me babyish but i prefer NOM to NGC i mean they put on the free vdeo"breath-taking footage"of the games.
Id like to see that video show one breath taking piece of film.smash bros was good though.
NGC have no honest opinions,they say everthing by nintendo and Rare and games like WWF that people want,they`ll go with the crowd,COWARDS
Id like to see that video show one breath taking piece of film.smash bros was good though.
NGC have no honest opinions,they say everthing by nintendo and Rare and games like WWF that people want,they`ll go with the crowd,COWARDS
Err, that was, umm, t-tactical p-posting??
Lol at the stupid double posts.
Shocky.
Lol at the stupid double posts.
Shocky.
Hmm, I was about to argue a lot here, but it seems that most of you have taken the side of NGC, too.
Yes, NGC is by FAR the better magazine. It is more informative - NOM has 95% picture and the rest is stupid, childish writing aimed at 10 year olds. If Nintendo want to demolish their 'kiddie console' stereotyping, then why don't they STOP NOM from being so 'kiddish'?
There, NGC = Class. NOM = Childish an annoying.
Shocktrooper.
Yes, NGC is by FAR the better magazine. It is more informative - NOM has 95% picture and the rest is stupid, childish writing aimed at 10 year olds. If Nintendo want to demolish their 'kiddie console' stereotyping, then why don't they STOP NOM from being so 'kiddish'?
There, NGC = Class. NOM = Childish an annoying.
Shocktrooper.
Hmm, I was about to argue a lot here, but it seems that most of you have taken the side of NGC, too.
Yes, NGC is by FAR the better magazine. It is more informative - NOM has 95% picture and the rest is stupid, childish writing aimed at 10 year olds. If Nintendo want to demolish their 'kiddie console' stereotyping, then why don't they STOP NOM from being so 'kiddish'?
There, NGC = Class. NOM = Childish an annoying.
Shocktrooper.
Yes, NGC is by FAR the better magazine. It is more informative - NOM has 95% picture and the rest is stupid, childish writing aimed at 10 year olds. If Nintendo want to demolish their 'kiddie console' stereotyping, then why don't they STOP NOM from being so 'kiddish'?
There, NGC = Class. NOM = Childish an annoying.
Shocktrooper.
i, my mum and my dad couldnt get the free video out of it's box! i had to cut open the box to get it out!
It will go nicely with all my other Ninty related stuff! :)
still it was an okish video.
slik ~_~
slik ~_~
Like I said in another thread, the Video was just a bunch of E3 clips which showed outdated, rough or sparse graphics - most of which had already been shown on Game Network!.
It would've been really nice if they'd had some footage of Spaceworld or the Nintendo UK show with the latest media.
It would've been really nice if they'd had some footage of Spaceworld or the Nintendo UK show with the latest media.
The video isn't anything special, unfortunatly, and is missing Zelda and Mario, which REALLY, REALLY, should be on there.
NOM is awful, but while I didn't really like N64 that much when I bought it about a year ago, it does seem a lot better now.
NOM is awful, but while I didn't really like N64 that much when I bought it about a year ago, it does seem a lot better now.
NGC is definately much better, they offer an impartial viewpoint, and also include import news as well.
Page: