Viewing Thread:
"NOM vs NGC"

NGC is much better then NOM because you get more information about games on the GC and GBA and you get a video in one of the issues and NOM do not even know about Mario Advance two yet.

look john j, i don't know what it is with your obsession with smints, but would you stop asking people if they like them! if they do like them then thats fine but not in this forum ok?
slik ~_~

Hi Chr!stos do you like smints!h

just wait a few days - I have spent weeks preparing a huge comparison between the two mags. The better one will be clear VERY soon!

Yes Total was a CLASSIC mag which I use to read and it was gr8!
NOM use to be great to, and each review etc had a good ol passage of text to go along with it. I just waiting for the day, that it goes back to how it use to be and then it will be a great magazine once again.

NOM is the worst gaming magazine I have EVER read. If you just look at the layout, they use half a page for the title, a massive picture of something and maybe 3 huge screenshots, and the smallest peice of text ever. They must think everyone is 6 and just wants to look at big pictures!! I felt embarassed reading it and came away detesting the bloody thing. OH has this topic hit a nerve. And the way they go on about greystation and all that, they must think they are so cool. Forget crayons, I've heard they are going to give away nappies with Mario on them!!!

Ahhh, thats better. Bring back TOTAL I say

Crayons!!!

WHoooo Im converted!

NOM, NOM, NOM!

:D

I was joking about the colouring book and crayons, lol.

Tiltawhirl wrote:
> Did you know that NOM are giving away a free, Nintendo colouring book and
> crayons with the next issue.

What do they think we are?

Two-year olds?

well ngc gave clayfighter 8% whats that!

Goemon hmm...... I think you really got that the wrong way round. NOM always gives most games above average marks ever though the game may be PANTS, whereas NGC tends to give proper reviews, with a good passage of TEXT explaining there decisions.