Viewing Thread:
"NOM vs NGC"

NGC is much better then NOM because you get more information about games on the GC and GBA and you get a video in one of the issues and NOM do not even know about Mario Advance two yet.

NGC is much better then NOM because you get more information about games on the GC and GBA and you get a video in one of the issues and NOM do not even know about Mario Advance two yet.

NGC has always been the better magazine. NOM is basically empty except for pictures.

i get both :)

Did you know that NOM are giving away a free, Nintendo colouring book and crayons with the next issue.

Can we please stop these magazine wars?

Oh alright then.......COLOURING IN BOOK.....HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!

Nom is crap, its made for 10 year olds. I mean the call PS, and DC : Greyation, greystation poo and dreampants.
How stupid. Also they dont review import games and they dont give an honest opinion. I bought n64 mag every month for 2 years , beacause it is the best. I cant wait to go to smiths tommorow and get NGC.

That keyring made a great mothball cleaner.

That Video made a great gamecube introduction experience.

NOM aren't all that bad.

They did manage to completely master how to get all the cheats on Perfect Dark (that alone deserves respect)

But they've deliberately written it for the "average Nintendo player" stereotyped to be a 10 year old.

Arr NOM isn't thaaat bad. It's readable and a thougrly good read. The only problem is that if you take out all the adverts and the pages filled with the scores n stuff that they gave past games then your left with a very slim mag. IT SHOULD BE BIGGER! Perhaps it will get bigger when the Gamecube is released!

Joe_Poly wrote:
> i get both :)

Thank you! finally someone who see's sense!
slik ~_~