The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Im getting the PS2 version on the 19th but I was wondering what you lot thought of the demo seeing as the versions will be similar.
Hedfix wrote:
> So given I buy games mainly for the purposes of multiplayer it seems
> like a good one to get. :)
ie getting Die Hard purely for it's multiplayer mode is what I am doing.
The single player mode is a bonus.
> CDS-2 has a better multiplayer than Die Hard: Vendetta.
How do you know? Its not even out yet...
Been playing the demo of this quite a bit today, and I have to say I wasn't particularly impressed by it. That's not to say that I think it's a bad game; far from it. It's just that it's not really my thing. For someone with my "intelligence", having to co-ordinate your team members' movement and hand out orders and suchlike really requires to much brain cell rubbing.
Plus I also found the aiming - both with and without auto-aim activated - quite dodgy, along with the character movement and animation, which for me has a vast influence over the amount of enjoyment I'm going to get out of a game.
Graphics were quite nice though. :P
> CDS-2 has a better multiplayer than Die Hard: Vendetta.
Co-op mabye but since it doesn't actually have a deathmatch mode it can hardly said to have a better deathmatch that Die Hard now can it?
If you check further down I believe I mentioned I was getting it for the Deathmatch and I have yet to finish co-operative play on the first C:DS.
> For someone with my "intelligence", having to
> co-ordinate your team members' movement and hand out orders and
> suchlike really requires to much brain cell rubbing.
>
Hmmmmm. I wonder why you don't like Morrowind then... :D