The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Then I could probably do a Pb and write something creative, however I see that I was not that creative to think about anything worth writing about.
I thought I could do a technical post, well I see Cjh (Gad Grabber) manages to write some foreign rubbish but seen as I didn’t understand it I thought I would forget about that one.
Ah yeah Bingo, such easy ways to try win one of these things. Its fine though but I seem to have been given the wrong cards all the time. Then when I think oh I only have three or four to go some nitwit posts that they only need one more. Then I check my card ugh; it’s one of the three-I needs… BAH!
I could even just drop hints about how I need £4.99 for a Mic like Machie does. I can see that gets him nowhere. Gees Machie get a part time job working at Maccy D’s, sure you’ll have it in no time at all.
Now I could take the easy way out and get some cheats together of some other random site. One easy way to get a Gad I’m sure. No effort at all in a bit of copy and pasting.
Wonder if we can get a Gad for Lurking, So many people lurk and are very much forgotten about. That doesn’t take too much effort, so I’m sure that’s a possible win for a Gad.
Then it came to me…
Why don’t I just ask for one…
Here goes in true Yosser style
"Gissa Gad"
No, Ah thought id ask anyway. You know what they say ‘You don’t ask you don’t get’
> ‘You don’t ask you don’t get’
:P
> I'm still waiting to see this exceptional...
Me too actually.
However, it's nearly always been the case that those who ask for GADs don't get them and those that deliberately write something just for a GAD don't usually end up winning either.
So one post by Grix gets a GAD (a free prize for one day given out by a website that doesn't really need to do this) I don't really see this as a major thing, myself.
> Ladybird wrote:
> Word. See, now this deserves a GAD much more than some numb
> lengthy, copied schizo post. Entertaining, insightful,
> heartfelt and engaging.. two thumbs!
>
> I keep trying to figure what the GAD criteria is for a win and
> all I can really imagine from what Vexxxed has said, is some
> n00b staffie sitting around on tea break perusing through the
> threads for something compelling.. whether it be for mere
> length, chuckle value, or insightful/enlightening content that
> is genuinely drafted by a member.
>
> Okay, so I'm assuming the second part.
>
> Vexxxed has reported there are more than one that makes the
> ultimate decision. So, then I get visuals of two n00b
> bobblehead staffies at a monitor and a lot of "yup, yup,
> yup.." going on. :P
>
> Yup this Staffies.. and give the girl a GAD :)~
>
> I can happily admit that I always look forward to reading your
> posts Ladybird, you always make me chuckle...even when
> ranting...but then I also like a nice little rant from time to
> time. I was thinking this may deserve a GAD, but then now that
> you have pointed this out, we will no doubt get abused for what
> would seem to be giving in so easily and being spinless :P
Aw. Such disappointment..
Now, however, I can safely arrive at the belief that only the less than worthy posts by Grix get you to be spineless in awarding GAD. Shame it is, giving in easily to the less than worthy and withhold from the exceptional, just because your inequities have been floodlighted.
The accountability in that must not be shoved onto the shoulders of your patrons.
> Vampyr wrote:
> when i returned, i spammed around some beautiful threads. none
> won, and now disillusioned i slip down the top posters ranking,
> gadless and sad :(
>
> Yeah the quiz one was good. I don't normally play those either.
>
> Where were your other ones then? In Sport and Reviews?
did a preview of a bunch of films comin out this year, bout 30 films. did a review somewhere of something. dont really care no more