The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
I think that DVD is alot better than a video as Videos are really bad quality and DVD are great quality.Also the sound is better on a DVD.
Which do you find better?
Which do you find better?
Page:
I got a dvd recorder from argos for £199.99 and it went wrong so we took it back and got a replacement, then the repleacement went wrong so we got a refund and went to comet and got a pioneer one for 249.99 and it has been good so far...touch wood!
I find DVDs better because they are easier to store and you dont have to wind through to find the thing you want.
DVDs also never lose quality however many times you watch them whereas Videos lose a little bit of quality everytime you watch them...so if you have a favourite video and you watch it 100s of times then you will end up with a really bad quality video.
I find DVDs better because they are easier to store and you dont have to wind through to find the thing you want.
DVDs also never lose quality however many times you watch them whereas Videos lose a little bit of quality everytime you watch them...so if you have a favourite video and you watch it 100s of times then you will end up with a really bad quality video.
DVD recorders are expensive i mean the one where you can record programs and its easier to destroy a DVD than a video so i say videos better.
The sooner, the better.
DVD much more stuff on it and their going to stop selling Video soon to they've already stopped in Dixons and other shops are going to be next!
munn wrote:
> Lipe wrote:
> DVD's are easier to break though. But I prefer DVD's, better quality
> and much smaller.
>
> Nuhuh.
>
> Stamp on a DVD = dirty footprint.
> Stamp on a VCR = broken plastic
Yeah but try snapping a DVD in half and you can. But it's much harder with a VHS tape.
> Lipe wrote:
> DVD's are easier to break though. But I prefer DVD's, better quality
> and much smaller.
>
> Nuhuh.
>
> Stamp on a DVD = dirty footprint.
> Stamp on a VCR = broken plastic
Yeah but try snapping a DVD in half and you can. But it's much harder with a VHS tape.
Lipe wrote:
> DVD's are easier to break though. But I prefer DVD's, better quality
> and much smaller.
Nuhuh.
Stamp on a DVD = dirty footprint.
Stamp on a VCR = broken plastic
> DVD's are easier to break though. But I prefer DVD's, better quality
> and much smaller.
Nuhuh.
Stamp on a DVD = dirty footprint.
Stamp on a VCR = broken plastic
M@rk wrote:
> VHS take up a huge amount of room. Also when a pile of VHS fall on you
> it hurts a lot more than if it was a pile of DVDs.
:D
It's true though, DVDs are a lot more convenient.
> VHS take up a huge amount of room. Also when a pile of VHS fall on you
> it hurts a lot more than if it was a pile of DVDs.
:D
It's true though, DVDs are a lot more convenient.
M@rk wrote:
> Ah but VCRs break easily, god knows how many times we've had to buy a
> new one or had one repaired.
My old one broke and was then repaired about 5 times. The new one has never broke though and I've had it for 2 years. I had the old one for about 10 years I think. DVD players are too new for us to know if they can last that long.
> Ah but VCRs break easily, god knows how many times we've had to buy a
> new one or had one repaired.
My old one broke and was then repaired about 5 times. The new one has never broke though and I've had it for 2 years. I had the old one for about 10 years I think. DVD players are too new for us to know if they can last that long.
Ah but VCRs break easily, god knows how many times we've had to buy a new one or had one repaired.
DVD's are easier to break though. But I prefer DVD's, better quality and much smaller.
Page: