Viewing Thread:
"ELECTION MONITORING - SOME VOTES MAY NOT COUNT"

Their are a number of people on this forum who seem intent on dragging the chat down to their level.

This causes me concern over the validity of the election and NO ANNOUNCEMENT will be made until I have had time to study the votes carefully. I'll be particularly careful to count the true valid votes only.

For future elections I will consider the matter in advance and tighten the rules accordingly.

I may also consider labelling the trouble-makers, so that instead of being Newbies or Regulars they may be Oranges or something instead. This would enable us to restrict their presence in some forums. I am only considering this at present, so your views are welcome.

In the mean time please don't count on the vote until it is announced.

Your Honour wrote:
> SHEEPY wrote:
Turbonutter wrote:
>Can I just point out that pb
> hasn't been around here for AGES. He posted a couple of topics when
> the whole vote thing was announced but now he just stays around the
> DVD forum.

I'm not saying he doesn't deserve to be a notable per
> sey, >but the rules state it iswho has made the biggest
> difference to the Future of Gaming forums, not the DVD forum.
>

Maybe it is comments like this that make people annoyed at
> >you Turbonutter.


> I agree with you Sheepy.



Where did he write this? Anyway, he's probably right.

I must admit, there has been a bit of, err, 'bartering' around this whole voting system you know, just keep an eye out for the ones who might of recieved votes that weren't entirely - hmmm - accurate...

Tony, that's a great idea, but please don't use the colour orange - it is my favourite.

Your Honour wrote:
> SHEEPY wrote:
Turbonutter wrote:
>Can I just point out that pb
> hasn't been around here for AGES. He posted a couple of topics when
> the whole vote thing was announced but now he just stays around the
> DVD forum.

I'm not saying he doesn't deserve to be a notable per
> sey, >but the rules state it iswho has made the biggest
> difference to the Future of Gaming forums, not the DVD forum.
>

Maybe it is comments like this that make people annoyed at
> >you Turbonutter.


I agree with you Sheepy.

I third that motion. (:)

CJC wrote:
> All trouble makers should have a certain amount of posts that they
> are allowed to make, say every week. This will make them think more
> carefully about what they post and will not have the chance to
> SPAM.
I dont think* it will take much programing.



Not much at all really but the webby's usually very busy.

SHEEPY wrote:
Turbonutter wrote:
>Can I just point out that pb hasn't been around here for AGES. He posted a couple of topics when the whole vote thing was announced but now he just stays around the DVD forum.

I'm not saying he doesn't deserve to be a notable per sey, >but the rules state it iswho has made the biggest difference to the Future of Gaming forums, not the DVD forum.

Maybe it is comments like this that make people annoyed at >you Turbonutter.


I agree with you Sheepy.

Oh, thank you Tony. I honestly thought you didn't like me.

All trouble makers should have a certain amount of posts that they are allowed to make, say every week. This will make them think more carefully about what they post and will not have the chance to SPAM.
I dont think* it will take much programing.

I blame Wookie and Mr Snuggly, those two never say anything serious.

Ban them all, ban them both to hell

(sorry, got Planet of The Apes in meh head)

No Turbo

In general I don't have any qualms with you. I think you are one of the people who are capable to making sure we keep reasonable standard.