The "Sony Games" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Yes, it`s been done before.
No, it won`t be as lond as the FOG version.
Why am I trying it out anyway?
The PS2 forum is a very interesting place to be, but it can also be a little quiet. I though perhaps if we had a topic with several hundred replies lurking at the top, things would look more popular.
Feel free to use the topic to talk about anything. Either the latest PS2 game, latest ideas for including some female star in a game etc... or even just the usual chat that happens all over.
As I expect this to fail, I`ve decided to spend a little while pushing up the replies. No spamming, just lots of nonsense :-)
Any help would be great, it`d be boring to have a whole topic with replies from only me.
No, it won`t be as lond as the FOG version.
Why am I trying it out anyway?
The PS2 forum is a very interesting place to be, but it can also be a little quiet. I though perhaps if we had a topic with several hundred replies lurking at the top, things would look more popular.
Feel free to use the topic to talk about anything. Either the latest PS2 game, latest ideas for including some female star in a game etc... or even just the usual chat that happens all over.
As I expect this to fail, I`ve decided to spend a little while pushing up the replies. No spamming, just lots of nonsense :-)
Any help would be great, it`d be boring to have a whole topic with replies from only me.
Page:
" lvlägmä Ðrägòón " wrote:
> i'll just try to blend them in using commas in my name.
Hehe!
> i'll just try to blend them in using commas in my name.
Hehe!
" lvlägmä Ðrägòón " wrote:
> i'll just try to blend them in using commas in my name.
Looks a bit better.
> i'll just try to blend them in using commas in my name.
Looks a bit better.
i'll just try to blend them in using commas in my name.
lvlägmä Ðrägòón wrote:
> AfroJoe wrote:
Good one, what number was it with alt?
it was alt + 0175
¯¯¯ oh yeah! ¯
> AfroJoe wrote:
Good one, what number was it with alt?
it was alt + 0175
¯¯¯ oh yeah! ¯
damn commans why do you need them any way.
what are you all talking about?
AfroJoe wrote:
Good one, what number was it with alt?
it was alt + 0175
Good one, what number was it with alt?
it was alt + 0175
Damned inverted commas!
lvlägmä Ðrägòón wrote:
> lvlägmä Ðrägòón wrote:
> there i've
> underlined it.
what do you think?
Good one, what number was it with alt?
> lvlägmä Ðrägòón wrote:
> there i've
> underlined it.
what do you think?
Good one, what number was it with alt?
Page: