The "Sony Games" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Yes, it`s been done before.
No, it won`t be as lond as the FOG version.
Why am I trying it out anyway?
The PS2 forum is a very interesting place to be, but it can also be a little quiet. I though perhaps if we had a topic with several hundred replies lurking at the top, things would look more popular.
Feel free to use the topic to talk about anything. Either the latest PS2 game, latest ideas for including some female star in a game etc... or even just the usual chat that happens all over.
As I expect this to fail, I`ve decided to spend a little while pushing up the replies. No spamming, just lots of nonsense :-)
Any help would be great, it`d be boring to have a whole topic with replies from only me.
No, it won`t be as lond as the FOG version.
Why am I trying it out anyway?
The PS2 forum is a very interesting place to be, but it can also be a little quiet. I though perhaps if we had a topic with several hundred replies lurking at the top, things would look more popular.
Feel free to use the topic to talk about anything. Either the latest PS2 game, latest ideas for including some female star in a game etc... or even just the usual chat that happens all over.
As I expect this to fail, I`ve decided to spend a little while pushing up the replies. No spamming, just lots of nonsense :-)
Any help would be great, it`d be boring to have a whole topic with replies from only me.
Page:
i told you i could blend it in, its just a little off, but does'nt matter.
AfroJoe wrote:
> Blank wrote:
> Changed my tagline again. Better than that dreadful one a
> minute ago.
Still crap! You can't insult mine coz, (hehe) it ain't there.
> Muahaha!
It ain't that bad! I only changed it because I got bored of my other one, which was class (not the blankety blank one)
> Blank wrote:
> Changed my tagline again. Better than that dreadful one a
> minute ago.
Still crap! You can't insult mine coz, (hehe) it ain't there.
> Muahaha!
It ain't that bad! I only changed it because I got bored of my other one, which was class (not the blankety blank one)
¦¦ lvlägmä Ðrägòón ¦¦ wrote:
> cough cough
Hehe. I like that!
> cough cough
Hehe. I like that!
¦¦ lvlägmä Ðrägòón ¦¦ wrote:
> cough cough
Looking better
> cough cough
Looking better
If you could make your tagline bold it would look good. Or vice versa, if you could take your username off bold.
cough cough
Blank wrote:
> Changed my tagline again. Better than that dreadful one a minute ago.
Still crap! You can't insult mine coz, (hehe) it ain't there. Muahaha!
> Changed my tagline again. Better than that dreadful one a minute ago.
Still crap! You can't insult mine coz, (hehe) it ain't there. Muahaha!
Just 50 posts for 9,000
Changed my tagline again. Better than that dreadful one a minute ago.
not too bad now but just a little more experimentation and it should look fine.
Page: