Viewing Thread:
"PS2 - LONGEST THREAD."

Yes, it`s been done before.
No, it won`t be as lond as the FOG version.


Why am I trying it out anyway?

The PS2 forum is a very interesting place to be, but it can also be a little quiet. I though perhaps if we had a topic with several hundred replies lurking at the top, things would look more popular.

Feel free to use the topic to talk about anything. Either the latest PS2 game, latest ideas for including some female star in a game etc... or even just the usual chat that happens all over.

As I expect this to fail, I`ve decided to spend a little while pushing up the replies. No spamming, just lots of nonsense :-)

Any help would be great, it`d be boring to have a whole topic with replies from only me.

Natbuc wrote:
> its probably coz if sr stored that many posts
> then their web space would get clogged up. Me thinks. Wespect.

But when you go to "Flip Order-Show Oldest First" it has all of the old ones, and i'm sure if you keep clicking on the "view older posts", you can probably view all ofthem.

Jive wrote:
> Here's a question that's open to everyone to answer. The page numbers at the
> top of this topic, "Go to Page 1 - 39" why is there only ever 39 pages
> in this topic?

I'm sure there should be far more and it's been stuck on that
> number for ages.

Anyone got any ideas??

It is the same in all the longest threads. SR have only allocated so much space so has new pages are added the old ones are deleted so save space on the servers.

§pånkër wrote:
> did anyone see the man city v newcastle game? Man city deserved to win it,
> especially with all those late chances.

They were very unlucky. How about the Spurs v tranmere match?

Jive wrote:
> Here's a question that's open to everyone to answer. The page numbers at the
> top of this topic, "Go to Page 1 - 39" why is there only ever 39 pages
> in this topic?

I'm sure there should be far more and it's been stuck on that
> number for ages.

Anyone got any ideas??


---
The server was getting too full so when it get s past 39 pages it just gets deleted.

But you'll find that if you could be bothered pressing Back Page about 300 times then it does go all the way back to the start.

Having hundreds of links on the screen doesn't work well.

did anyone see the man city v newcastle game? Man city deserved to win it, especially with all those late chances.

thanks spanker....and jive.....its probably coz if sr stored that many posts then their web space would get clogged up. Me thinks. Wespect.

Shadow wrote:
> §pånkër wrote:
> did anyone see the chelsea v preston game
> yesterday?

Yeh Preston were dead unlucky, the Chelsea Keeper did a great job
> in keeping Chelsea in the game.

yeah, preston were playing very well for a division 1 team.

Here's a question that's open to everyone to answer. The page numbers at the top of this topic, "Go to Page 1 - 39" why is there only ever 39 pages in this topic?

I'm sure there should be far more and it's been stuck on that number for ages.

Anyone got any ideas??

Jive wrote:
especially with the release of SOE in the very near
> future.

I am looking forward to this game when it comes out on Friday, I noticed that Dynasty Warriors 3 is also down for release this week. I thought it was not due to mid March, it will have to wait, no point getting another game this week, when I will be busy with SOE.

Natbuc wrote:
> www.geocities.com/natbuc1/alibanner

check my banner pages and could u please
> give me feedback....pro's....cons.....ones u like....ect :)

the xbox, gamecube and ukps2.com ones are the best ones i reckon, and i could definitely imagine myself seeing them around the chatforums etc.