Viewing Thread:
"PS2 - LONGEST THREAD."

Yes, it`s been done before.
No, it won`t be as lond as the FOG version.


Why am I trying it out anyway?

The PS2 forum is a very interesting place to be, but it can also be a little quiet. I though perhaps if we had a topic with several hundred replies lurking at the top, things would look more popular.

Feel free to use the topic to talk about anything. Either the latest PS2 game, latest ideas for including some female star in a game etc... or even just the usual chat that happens all over.

As I expect this to fail, I`ve decided to spend a little while pushing up the replies. No spamming, just lots of nonsense :-)

Any help would be great, it`d be boring to have a whole topic with replies from only me.

Shadow wrote:
> Natbuc wrote:
> §pånkër wrote:
> are you a spurs fan
> Natbuc?


Sure am

Someone has to be, although I do hope they give
> blackburn a good trashing on Sunday.


yup

§pånkër wrote:
> Natbuc wrote:
> §pånkër wrote:
> are you a spurs fan
> Natbuc?


Sure am

see you in the quarter finals of the FA cup.


Yup....another 5-1 win i think :)

Natbuc wrote:
> §pånkër wrote:
> are you a spurs fan Natbuc?


Sure am

Someone has to be, although I do hope they give blackburn a good trashing on Sunday.

Natbuc wrote:
> §pånkër wrote:
> are you a spurs fan Natbuc?


Sure am

see you in the quarter finals of the FA cup.

§pånkër wrote:
> are you a spurs fan Natbuc?


Sure am

are you a spurs fan Natbuc?

Thanks gents for the explanation, never really go in FOG so I didn't notice their limits there.

Explanation about the server space and the links on screen makes sense, I should really have thought of that before asking the question.....oh well, too late now!

Natbuc wrote:
> §pånkër wrote:
> did anyone see the man city v newcastle
> game? Man city deserved to win it,
> especially with all those late
> chances.

They were very unlucky. How about the Spurs v tranmere match?

spurs completely trounced 'em, it was funny. The chelsea reject scored 2 goals, god i miss poyet being at chelsea.

§pånkër wrote:
yeah,
> preston were playing very well for a division 1 team.

They are playing quite well this season and whilst they would struggle in the Premiership it is good to see them measure up against Prem. teams.

§pånkër wrote:
> Natbuc wrote:
> its probably coz if sr stored that many posts
> then
> their web space would get clogged up. Me thinks. Wespect.

But when you go to
> "Flip Order-Show Oldest First" it has all of the old ones, and i'm
> sure if you keep clicking on the "view older posts", you can probably
> view all ofthem.


well it must be like thingy said......a load of links would look gay.