The "Sony Games" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
No, it won`t be as lond as the FOG version.
Why am I trying it out anyway?
The PS2 forum is a very interesting place to be, but it can also be a little quiet. I though perhaps if we had a topic with several hundred replies lurking at the top, things would look more popular.
Feel free to use the topic to talk about anything. Either the latest PS2 game, latest ideas for including some female star in a game etc... or even just the usual chat that happens all over.
As I expect this to fail, I`ve decided to spend a little while pushing up the replies. No spamming, just lots of nonsense :-)
Any help would be great, it`d be boring to have a whole topic with replies from only me.
Pro Evo
Kid Rock
badgerman
the exterminator
grapo
toni cabriani
Triple H
Raziel
Grandprix
Joe Dark
the flying hawkster
ben hodgetts
Ant
Legendary Link
Jetster
Spanker
> §pånkër wrote:
> AfroJoe wrote:
>
> §pånkër wrote:
> AfroJoe
> wrote:
>
>
> G®åpô²ºº¹
> wrote:
>
>
> Quazimodo
>
> wrote:
> AfroJoe
>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> G®åpô²ºº¹
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> AfroJoe
>
>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> G®åpô²ºº¹
>
>
>
>
>
>
> wrote:
>
> I was not aware
> of
>
> that
>
>
>
>
> adrian
----
Why
> don't you change
> the 2001 in
>
> your
>
>
> name
>
> to
> 2002?
Thats a valid
> point
> but i
>
>
>
> cba.
----
It's doesn't take
> much
>
>
>
> effort...
Fair
>
>
> enough
HEHE, lets see what
> the
>
> longest
> 'reply quoting this message'
> is
> we can
> get. Dunno
> why
> mind u!
----
yeah, ok then. Something
> to
>
> do.
----
why are we
> doing
> this?
-----
dunno...
> :-)
-----
does anyone else knw
> why??
--------------------------
I was going to reply saying 'doing
> what!?'
But i wont.
nor wil i
> §pånkër wrote:
> adrian wrote:
> Kid Rock wrote:
>
> yup true we should be getting the next
> thousand by sunday
>
> night
Are we trying to get 16,000 by sunday ?
yes
> we are.
Ok,
> i'll help do a few posts.
MGS2 in 6.5 days.
X-Box in 12.5 days.
---
Cant wait!!
> §pånkër wrote:
> AfroJoe wrote:
>
> §pånkër wrote:
> AfroJoe
> wrote:
>
>
> G®åpô²ºº¹
> wrote:
>
>
> Quazimodo
>
> wrote:
> AfroJoe
>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> G®åpô²ºº¹
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> AfroJoe
>
>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> G®åpô²ºº¹
>
>
>
>
>
>
> wrote:
>
> I was not aware
> of
>
> that
>
>
>
>
> adrian
----
Why
> don't you change
> the 2001 in
>
> your
>
>
> name
>
> to
> 2002?
Thats a valid
> point
> but i
>
>
>
> cba.
----
It's doesn't take
> much
>
>
>
> effort...
Fair
>
>
> enough
HEHE, lets see what
> the
>
> longest
> 'reply quoting this message'
> is
> we can
> get. Dunno
> why
> mind u!
----
yeah, ok then. Something
> to
>
> do.
----
why are we
> doing
> this?
-----
dunno...
> :-)
-----
does anyone else knw
> why??
--------------------------
I was going to reply saying 'doing
> what!?'
But i wont.
-----
I think you should have.
> AfroJoe wrote:
> §pånkër wrote:
> AfroJoe
> wrote:
>
> G®åpô²ºº¹
> wrote:
>
> Quazimodo
>
> wrote:
> AfroJoe
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> G®åpô²ºº¹ wrote:
>
>
>
>
> AfroJoe
>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> G®åpô²ºº¹
>
>
>
>
>
> wrote:
>
> I was not aware
> of
> that
>
>
>
>
> adrian
----
Why
> don't you change the 2001 in
>
> your
>
>
> name
>
> to 2002?
Thats a valid
> point
> but i
>
>
> cba.
----
It's doesn't take
> much
>
>
> effort...
Fair
>
>
> enough
HEHE, lets see what the
>
> longest
> 'reply quoting this message'
> is
> we can get. Dunno
> why
> mind u!
----
yeah, ok then. Something to
>
> do.
----
why are we
> doing this?
-----
dunno...
> :-)
-----
does anyone else knw why??
--------------------------
I was going to reply saying 'doing what!?'
But i wont.
> adrian wrote:
> Kid Rock wrote:
> yup true we should be getting the next
> thousand by sunday
> night
Are we trying to get 16,000 by sunday ?
yes
> we are.
Ok, i'll help do a few posts.
MGS2 in 6.5 days.
X-Box in 12.5 days.
> §pånkër wrote:
> AfroJoe wrote:
>
> G®åpô²ºº¹ wrote:
>
> Quazimodo
>
> wrote:
> AfroJoe wrote:
>
>
>
>
> G®åpô²ºº¹ wrote:
>
>
>
> AfroJoe
>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> G®åpô²ºº¹
>
>
>
>
> wrote:
>
> I was not aware
> of
> that
>
>
>
> adrian
----
Why
> don't you change the 2001 in
> your
>
>
> name
>
> to 2002?
Thats a valid
> point but i
>
>
> cba.
----
It's doesn't take
> much
>
> effort...
Fair
>
>
> enough
HEHE, lets see what the
> longest
> 'reply quoting this message'
> is
> we can get. Dunno why
> mind u!
----
yeah, ok then. Something to
> do.
----
why are we
> doing this?
-----
dunno... :-)
-----
does anyone else knw why??
> AfroJoe wrote:
> G®åpô²ºº¹ wrote:
>
> Quazimodo
> wrote:
> AfroJoe wrote:
>
>
>
> G®åpô²ºº¹ wrote:
>
>
> AfroJoe
>
> wrote:
>
>
> G®åpô²ºº¹
>
>
>
> wrote:
>
> I was not aware
> of
> that
>
>
> adrian
----
Why
> don't you change the 2001 in
> your
>
> name
>
> to 2002?
Thats a valid
> point but i
>
> cba.
----
It's doesn't take
> much
> effort...
Fair
>
>
> enough
HEHE, lets see what the longest
> 'reply quoting this message'
> is
> we can get. Dunno why mind u!
----
yeah, ok then. Something to
> do.
----
why are we doing this?
-----
dunno... :-)
> G®åpô²ºº¹ wrote:
> Quazimodo
> wrote:
> AfroJoe wrote:
>
>
> G®åpô²ºº¹ wrote:
>
> AfroJoe
>
> wrote:
>
> G®åpô²ºº¹
>
>
> wrote:
>
> I was not aware
> of
> that
>
> adrian
----
Why
> don't you change the 2001 in
> your
> name
>
> to 2002?
Thats a valid
> point but i
> cba.
----
It's doesn't take
> much
> effort...
Fair
>
> enough
HEHE, lets see what the longest
> 'reply quoting this message' is
> we can get. Dunno why mind u!
----
yeah, ok then. Something to do.
----
why are we doing this?