The "Sony Games" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
No, it won`t be as lond as the FOG version.
Why am I trying it out anyway?
The PS2 forum is a very interesting place to be, but it can also be a little quiet. I though perhaps if we had a topic with several hundred replies lurking at the top, things would look more popular.
Feel free to use the topic to talk about anything. Either the latest PS2 game, latest ideas for including some female star in a game etc... or even just the usual chat that happens all over.
As I expect this to fail, I`ve decided to spend a little while pushing up the replies. No spamming, just lots of nonsense :-)
Any help would be great, it`d be boring to have a whole topic with replies from only me.
> §pånkër wrote:
> adrian wrote:
> So whats everyone up
> to?
well im on thew internet :P
Yeah me too. Thats funny that. So what I
> was really saying is "what have you all been up to?"
i went out to play some footy and a bit of tennis earlier.
> adrian wrote:
> So whats everyone up to?
well im on thew internet :P
Yeah me too. Thats funny that. So what I was really saying is "what have you all been up to?"
> So whats everyone up to?
well im on thew internet :P
I have to go too in fact.
See you all soon, maybe later on tonight, I'm not sure.
> FOR METALGEAR2KING:
Pro Evo
Kid Rock
badgerman
the exterminator
grapo
>
toni cabriani
Triple H
Raziel
Grandprix
Joe Dark
the flying hawkster
>
ben hodgetts
Ant
Legendary Link
Jetster
Spanker
why did you, a PS2 crew member, vote for the new Sony's cronies member?
KR
> Pro Evo wrote:
> §pånkër wrote:
> AfroJoe
> wrote:
>
> §pånkër wrote:
> AfroJoe
>
> wrote:
>
>
> G®åpô²ºº¹
>
> wrote:
>
>
> Quazimodo
>
> wrote:
> AfroJoe
>
>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> G®åpô²ºº¹
>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> AfroJoe
>
>
>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> G®åpô²ºº¹
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> wrote:
>
> I was not aware
> of
>
>
> that
>
>
>
>
> adrian
----
Why
> don't you
> change
> the 2001 in
>
> your
>
>
> name
>
>
> to
> 2002?
Thats a valid
> point
> but i
>
>
>
>
> cba.
----
It's doesn't take
> much
>
>
>
>
> effort...
Fair
>
>
> enough
HEHE, lets see what
>
> the
>
> longest
> 'reply quoting this message'
> is
> we
> can
> get. Dunno
> why
> mind u!
----
yeah, ok then.
> Something
> to
>
> do.
----
why are we
> doing
>
> this?
-----
dunno...
> :-)
-----
does anyone else knw
>
> why??
--------------------------
I was going to reply saying 'doing
>
> what!?'
But i wont.
-----
I think you should have.
-----
why should he have??