The "Nintendo Games" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Why did Nintendo even bother thinking about releasing another cartridge game like the N64. They must have known that gamind with CD's was the new era.
Here are a few reasons why the N64, shouldn't have been released:
1) Cartridge games are dearer to produce, therefore we, the customers, find the games more pricey which then leads to us not buying them.
2) The cartrides and the consoles are bulkier than other consoles.
3) Cartridge games have to be cleaned more often because the dust gathers in the hole were the cartridge is inserted.
4) If you push the cartridge in too forcefully, you can wreck them.
If you wanted, you could say ''Wht did they bring out CD based consoles if it was posible to have just the same efects with a cartridge console. If all consoles were cartridge based then maybe the games could be sold for less.
Here are a few reasons why the N64, shouldn't have been released:
1) Cartridge games are dearer to produce, therefore we, the customers, find the games more pricey which then leads to us not buying them.
2) The cartrides and the consoles are bulkier than other consoles.
3) Cartridge games have to be cleaned more often because the dust gathers in the hole were the cartridge is inserted.
4) If you push the cartridge in too forcefully, you can wreck them.
If you wanted, you could say ''Wht did they bring out CD based consoles if it was posible to have just the same efects with a cartridge console. If all consoles were cartridge based then maybe the games could be sold for less.
Page:
my first pot as a regular. i do agree with this being a pointless topic. what was the point of releasing the n64? what do u think. to eat or wear or something.
That original post was probably the most stupid question i've ever heard.
What do you mean - "Why was the N64 ever released?" What an idiot.
Tsk Tsk.
What do you mean - "Why was the N64 ever released?" What an idiot.
Tsk Tsk.
slik wrote:
> yep, it does'nt say much for sony when their consoles and their
> games look like a steaming pile of cack! i mean they actually had to
> re-design it in the shape of the ps-one! did Nintendo ever have to
> re-design any of their consoles? nope! because they allready look
> innoative and original as they are!
slik ~_~
Excuse me? Nintendo have released different versions of their consoles in some territories for years - even the NES had a top loading american version. The US SNES was just plain ugly, and changed for the UK release...and the Game Boy? Gone through a few redesigns..
> yep, it does'nt say much for sony when their consoles and their
> games look like a steaming pile of cack! i mean they actually had to
> re-design it in the shape of the ps-one! did Nintendo ever have to
> re-design any of their consoles? nope! because they allready look
> innoative and original as they are!
slik ~_~
Excuse me? Nintendo have released different versions of their consoles in some territories for years - even the NES had a top loading american version. The US SNES was just plain ugly, and changed for the UK release...and the Game Boy? Gone through a few redesigns..
SHHD wrote:
> The only problem I had with the N64 was its blurry graphics!
Think
> Zelda.
is that how nintendo dealt with anti-alaising
> The only problem I had with the N64 was its blurry graphics!
Think
> Zelda.
is that how nintendo dealt with anti-alaising
someone questioning the power and graphical design. never heard that before although i do think the n64 is quite a good console.
yep, it does'nt say much for sony when their consoles and their games look like a steaming pile of cack! i mean they actually had to re-design it in the shape of the ps-one! did Nintendo ever have to re-design any of their consoles? nope! because they allready look innoative and original as they are!
slik ~_~
slik ~_~
Page: