The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
This thread has been linked to the game 'Fifa 2004'.
Which one do you think is better?
I prefer Fifa 2004, which is probably the opposite answer of what many people will reply with.
I prefer Fifa 2004, which is probably the opposite answer of what many people will reply with.
Page:
AfroJoe wrote:
> I'm sorry, but you claim you've only been playing the game for a
> couple of days. In that case, I seriously doubt you could win 5-0 on
> PES3 5-star.
Wakka wrote:
> In Pro Evo I was Man U and I was playing West Ham United. They were
> easy.
Bit late to be putting us right, Wakka.
> I'm sorry, but you claim you've only been playing the game for a
> couple of days. In that case, I seriously doubt you could win 5-0 on
> PES3 5-star.
Wakka wrote:
> In Pro Evo I was Man U and I was playing West Ham United. They were
> easy.
Bit late to be putting us right, Wakka.
Maverick42 wrote:
> After two days you can beat a premiership side on five stars?
I've had the game for about a month.
> You must've played it for hours, or have played copious amounts of
> the two before it. No newcomer could do that. It'd be impossible.
I've played Pro Evo 3 for about 40 hours and I've played Pro Evo 2 for about 100 hours.
> After two days you can beat a premiership side on five stars?
I've had the game for about a month.
> You must've played it for hours, or have played copious amounts of
> the two before it. No newcomer could do that. It'd be impossible.
I've played Pro Evo 3 for about 40 hours and I've played Pro Evo 2 for about 100 hours.
After two days you can beat a premiership side on five stars?
You must've played it for hours, or have played copious amounts of the two before it. No newcomer could do that. It'd be impossible.
You must've played it for hours, or have played copious amounts of the two before it. No newcomer could do that. It'd be impossible.
Maverick42 wrote:
> No.
>
> Brazil vs. Japan on four stars is very hard. When you're Brazil.
I'm not joking.
> No.
>
> Brazil vs. Japan on four stars is very hard. When you're Brazil.
I'm not joking.
No.
Brazil vs. Japan on four stars is very hard. When you're Brazil.
Brazil vs. Japan on four stars is very hard. When you're Brazil.
AfroJoe wrote:
> Wakka wrote:
> My highest score on PES3 on the hardest difficulty - 5-0
>
> My highest score on FIFA 2004 on the hardest difficulty - 3-0
>
> I'm sorry, but you claim you've only been playing the game for a
> couple of days. In that case, I seriously doubt you could win 5-0 on
> PES3 5-star.
In Pro Evo I was Man U and I was playing West Ham United. They were easy.
> Wakka wrote:
> My highest score on PES3 on the hardest difficulty - 5-0
>
> My highest score on FIFA 2004 on the hardest difficulty - 3-0
>
> I'm sorry, but you claim you've only been playing the game for a
> couple of days. In that case, I seriously doubt you could win 5-0 on
> PES3 5-star.
In Pro Evo I was Man U and I was playing West Ham United. They were easy.
for the first few days i couldent even score, lol.
can now by the way.
can now by the way.
Wakka wrote:
> My highest score on PES3 on the hardest difficulty - 5-0
>
> My highest score on FIFA 2004 on the hardest difficulty - 3-0
I'm sorry, but you claim you've only been playing the game for a couple of days. In that case, I seriously doubt you could win 5-0 on PES3 5-star.
> My highest score on PES3 on the hardest difficulty - 5-0
>
> My highest score on FIFA 2004 on the hardest difficulty - 3-0
I'm sorry, but you claim you've only been playing the game for a couple of days. In that case, I seriously doubt you could win 5-0 on PES3 5-star.
All credit to the 2003 and 2004 versions, at least they've tried, but they're still a hell of a lot easier. Just without reading the manual you can pick it up, play it on average difficulty, and win quite easily. With PES3, it's a real challenge to get good enough for three star difficulty, let alone four or five.
Wakka wrote:
> I find FIFA games harder.
I agree 100%
Only because it's harder to play because the simple things aren't even done right, like passing and running.
It's all wrong.
But they can keep releasing FIFA 97 in a new box for years to come because it keeps Konami going.
Plus they are duller, don't have the "one more go" aspect and you don't get the feeling that you scored an amazing goal because some aspect of any goal is bound to be unrealistic, even if it be the still crappy net movements. A net doesn't parry a ball to then shoot out half a second later.
And on the shot of the stadium before a match it seems as if you've got a 10 x 5 metre pitch until you seemingly have twice the size of a regular pitch.
Dimensions are crazee.
> I find FIFA games harder.
I agree 100%
Only because it's harder to play because the simple things aren't even done right, like passing and running.
It's all wrong.
But they can keep releasing FIFA 97 in a new box for years to come because it keeps Konami going.
Plus they are duller, don't have the "one more go" aspect and you don't get the feeling that you scored an amazing goal because some aspect of any goal is bound to be unrealistic, even if it be the still crappy net movements. A net doesn't parry a ball to then shoot out half a second later.
And on the shot of the stadium before a match it seems as if you've got a 10 x 5 metre pitch until you seemingly have twice the size of a regular pitch.
Dimensions are crazee.
Page: