Viewing Thread:
"James Bond 007: Everything or Nothing"

Absolutely class game. Albino-Man approves.

By the way, does the game utilise Ragdoll physics?

Short but sweet is the great thing about the latest action games. Max Payne 2 and Call of Duty spring to mind as being two of the finest games last year yet also two of the shortest. Providing they can keep you entertained throughout I would rather have that than a game which drags on and is bland and borin in places.

Its ironic that my new found joy lies within RPG's. I used to love all games to be short and sweet but now I prefer to invest my time in massive RPG's and only play a select number of other games in and amongst.

Completed it yesterday in just over 24 hours

*cries*

It took me longer to complete Nightfire...

Still, it seems to have quite a bit of replay value, trying to get all the rewards and cheats 'n all. I do think it is the Best Bond Game Ever in terms of single player though, really is very fun...

The harshest amongst the critics has to be GamesTM and Gamespot. Gamespot gave it 8.8 however the former I am yet to read.

Was well impressed by the demo of Everything or Nothing - Hope to pick the full game up next week!

Albino-Man wrote:
> It's brilliant.
>
> Controversial stuff coming up...
>
> Best. Bond game. Ever.
>
> *runs*


MUH?

NGC are my bible

Goldeneye - 94%
EON - 68%

I have yet to play it, but Goldeneye stole my life for weeks.

Hmmm.......

Albino-Man wrote:
> I preferred Perfect Dark; single player and multiplayer.

seconded for the multiplayer
goldeneye was better for single player

*the foot has spoken*

I preferred Perfect Dark; single player and multiplayer.

You wouldn't be the first to say that over the last few days. Certainly from a single player point of view anyway, thats the general concensus. Multiplayer; I can't find anyone to say that Golden Eye didn't rule all.

It's brilliant.

Controversial stuff coming up...

Best. Bond game. Ever.

*runs*