The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
now i've posted this thread to complain about soldiers sacrificing their lives for thier country and foot ballers just getting about 25'000 pounds/dollars just for showing up at a football match and playing with the only threat of breaking thier leg whilst in afganistan soldiers sometimes come home in a coffin so if ur like me and think soldiers should get more wages then plz reply
Page:
pokemanic333 wrote:
> hey did anyone see in the news about that female soldier killed
> in a jeep with a bomb going off or somthing they say that the
> jeep was poorly equiped so does anyone think that the reason it
> was poorly equiped was due to lack of money maybe? i think so
No I didn't see that.
I'm assuming it wasn't a British soldier as the British don't use 'Jeeps'!
I may have missed it, but are you all clear on the earlier discussion about the 'UK government wasting money on footballers' ? :¬P
I'm a Land Rover fan!
> hey did anyone see in the news about that female soldier killed
> in a jeep with a bomb going off or somthing they say that the
> jeep was poorly equiped so does anyone think that the reason it
> was poorly equiped was due to lack of money maybe? i think so
No I didn't see that.
I'm assuming it wasn't a British soldier as the British don't use 'Jeeps'!
I may have missed it, but are you all clear on the earlier discussion about the 'UK government wasting money on footballers' ? :¬P
I'm a Land Rover fan!
[s]Hmmm...[/s] 
pokemanic333 wrote:
> hey did anyone see in the news about that female soldier killed
> in a jeep with a bomb going off or somthing they say that the
> jeep was poorly equiped so does anyone think that the reason it
> was poorly equiped was due to lack of money maybe? i think so
I thought that that fact had been established a few years ago, around about the Iraq conflict:-)
> hey did anyone see in the news about that female soldier killed
> in a jeep with a bomb going off or somthing they say that the
> jeep was poorly equiped so does anyone think that the reason it
> was poorly equiped was due to lack of money maybe? i think so
I thought that that fact had been established a few years ago, around about the Iraq conflict:-)
hey did anyone see in the news about that female soldier killed in a jeep with a bomb going off or somthing they say that the jeep was poorly equiped so does anyone think that the reason it was poorly equiped was due to lack of money maybe? i think so
Heh...although that is missing DLs point, perhaps we should all get back on topic...
And you have been warned about double-posting pokemaniac...any more I shall be deleting the most irrelevant post....
And you have been warned about double-posting pokemaniac...any more I shall be deleting the most irrelevant post....
Dragonlance wrote:
> pokemanic333 wrote:
> Dragonlance wrote:
> Seeing as pokemanic333 started this thread....does anyone see a
> comment from him at this point? (Just like other threads 'he'
> has
> begun):-|
>
>
> actually maybe u should look harder -_- for a coment made by my
> lol
>
> The point being made is that on the 31st January I made that
> comment. At that point you had made no posts anywhere, except to
> start some - no follow up.
>
> Replying on 22nd February - is a bit late in my view and not as
> has been mentioned before, 'following the thread':-|
um i did post a coment on the next page look plz :)
> pokemanic333 wrote:
> Dragonlance wrote:
> Seeing as pokemanic333 started this thread....does anyone see a
> comment from him at this point? (Just like other threads 'he'
> has
> begun):-|
>
>
> actually maybe u should look harder -_- for a coment made by my
> lol
>
> The point being made is that on the 31st January I made that
> comment. At that point you had made no posts anywhere, except to
> start some - no follow up.
>
> Replying on 22nd February - is a bit late in my view and not as
> has been mentioned before, 'following the thread':-|
um i did post a coment on the next page look plz :)
pokemanic333 wrote:
> Dragonlance wrote:
> Seeing as pokemanic333 started this thread....does anyone see a
> comment from him at this point? (Just like other threads 'he'
> has
> begun):-|
>
>
> actually maybe u should look harder -_- for a coment made by my
> lol
The point being made is that on the 31st January I made that comment. At that point you had made no posts anywhere, except to start some - no follow up.
Replying on 22nd February - is a bit late in my view and not as has been mentioned before, 'following the thread':-|
> Dragonlance wrote:
> Seeing as pokemanic333 started this thread....does anyone see a
> comment from him at this point? (Just like other threads 'he'
> has
> begun):-|
>
>
> actually maybe u should look harder -_- for a coment made by my
> lol
The point being made is that on the 31st January I made that comment. At that point you had made no posts anywhere, except to start some - no follow up.
Replying on 22nd February - is a bit late in my view and not as has been mentioned before, 'following the thread':-|
Warhunt wrote:
> As HM said.
>
> Also if you need some help on how posting on here works, let us
> know. Your posts are pretty much all replies with weird styling
> which looks like you may be posting inside the previous posts
> tags.
>
> When you reply to a message, Type under where the icons
> have finished.
i do
> As HM said.
>
> Also if you need some help on how posting on here works, let us
> know. Your posts are pretty much all replies with weird styling
> which looks like you may be posting inside the previous posts
> tags.
>
> When you reply to a message, Type under where the icons
> have finished.
i do
Gold Timbo wrote:
> I'm confused.
what about?
> I'm confused.
what about?
I'm confused.
HM wrote:
> pokemanic333 wrote:
> ButchML wrote:
> pokemanic333 wrote:
> well i think i started quite a big debate i wouldnt be suprised
> if it was in the news tomorrow lol XD
>
> I would.
> >
> it was a joke i wasnt being seriours o_O
>
> Hence the sarcasm :p
look i said that to explain it in a funny way or somthing i didnt mean the debate i ment the joke about what i said like i could just say "oh yeah its a big debate" that would be boring would'nt it?
P.S: [s] i meant the first thing i said
> pokemanic333 wrote:
> ButchML wrote:
> pokemanic333 wrote:
> well i think i started quite a big debate i wouldnt be suprised
> if it was in the news tomorrow lol XD
>
> I would.
> >
> it was a joke i wasnt being seriours o_O
>
> Hence the sarcasm :p
look i said that to explain it in a funny way or somthing i didnt mean the debate i ment the joke about what i said like i could just say "oh yeah its a big debate" that would be boring would'nt it?
P.S: [s] i meant the first thing i said
Page: