Viewing Thread:
"rage against x factor"

Are you getting fed up about the possibility of ANOTHER X-Factor Christmas No.1? ...us too...so we're going to do something about it!

We are all buying a download of 'KILLING IN THE NAME' by RAGE AGAINST THE MACHINE right NOW! until the end of Saturday 19th December (23:59pm).

THIS IS NOT A CLEVER ADVERTISING PLOY, LOOK UP RAGE AGAINST THE MACHINE ON WIKIPEDIA, THEY ARE DEFINATLEY NOT SOME LARGE CORPORATE PUPPET THEY SUPPORT MANY GOOD CAUSES AS DOES THE FACEBOOK GROUP PUSHING THIS


LET'S GET RAGE AGAINST THE MACHINE TO THE CHRISTMAS NO.1 SPOT THEN!

We cannot mass message all members. Facebook disable that option on large groups!

Q: So how do we do this then?
A: Take your pick(s) of the digital providers below. It should take you to the page where you can purchase your copy of KILLING IN THE NAME. in most cases it's track#2 but check before you click!

Q: Why have you used shortened links?
A: It gives us a ROUGH idea of how we are doing on sales. I can get a click count this way

Q: But there's other websites now offering RAGE for Xmas links?
A: Yes, but these links right here were created by the creators of the whole campaign themselves. They are not 'affiliate' links so therefore nobody gets any sort of 'commision'. You don't need to go anywhere else.

Q: When do i buy 'Killing In The Name'?
A: NOW until Saturday 19th December at 23:59pm

Q: Can I buy loads of downloads?
A: In a nutshell no. If the Chart company see unusual selling patterns they can ignore the bulk purchases or worse still remove the track completely. As admin I cannot be seen to encourage this

** DO NOT DOWNLOAD IT 10 TIMES OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT...IT'LL JUST GET ANNULLED FROM THE CHART **
read- http://bit.ly/dontbuyloads (interesting from James)
read- http://bit.ly/lessonlearnt (BBC news article)

==================================
Direct linking approved by the Official Charts Company. I spoke to them personally on this


Price Comparison site - http://bit.ly/comparedownloadprices


iTUNES - 99p - track #2 (click on 'view in itunes' on the right)
http://bit.ly/ratm-itunes

PLAY.COM - 65p - it's the only track on the page
http://bit.ly/ratm-play

7DIGITAL - £1.19P - track #2
http://bit.ly/ratm-7digital

HMV.COM - 79p (careful - this is track #1)
http://bit.ly/ratm-hmv

TUNETRIBE - 49P - track #2 - LIVE version (yes it counts)
http://bit.ly/ratm-tunetribe
or
http://bit.ly/rage-tunetribe (Studio Version)

TESCO DIGITAL - 67p - track #2
http://bit.ly/ratm-tesco

AMAZON - 29p - YES IT COUNTS: CONFIRMED
http://bit.ly/rage-amazon

WE7 - £1.07p - track #2
http://bit.ly/ratm-we7

==================================

Got any spare change in your account? We're collecting for SHELTER. If everyone in our group donates £1...we'll have raised over HALF A MILLION pounds! Not bad for a facebook group
http://www.justgiving.com/ratm4xmas/

LET'S MAKE THIS A HISTORIC CHRISTMAS ON MANY LEVELS

big it up da xmas bling!



Probably :P

Naw, it's just a scam to teach chavs that shiny stuff isn't necessarily valuable :)

I bet rage are proud to be number 1 of the pop charts for a week.

They'll be on Pop Party 8 now! :)

On the religious debate of the thread...doesn't the Christmas tradition of tinsel have a lot to do with pagan traditions of hanging intestines and other food stuffs high in trees to prevent certain animals getting to them? (or something like that)

Primitive, but then again aren't we regressing to a primative society of chavs and yobs?

*Realises in horror if we did have pagan chavs... offerings of bottles of White Lightning to a scarecrow god dressed in burberry...may be best we stay as we are!*

I like the way Dragonlance makes it sounds as if he is even a Pagan at the moment, or was alive at the time. I knew he was old but dang!! :D

My view is that the Pagan belief didn't die out for no reason. It may have been pushed aside by Christianity but it couldn't have been that hard to convert. It was very very primitive, and quite extreme which would just not cut it with advanced society.

Sonic Chris wrote:
> Mission success. I've managed to divert the topic onto Religious
> Beliefs :D

Indeed you have.

Maybe we should revert to our pagan roots. I feel like a sacrifice coming on :p

Mission success. I've managed to divert the topic onto Religious Beliefs :D

hippyman wrote:
> I had my own theory that I could call my beliefs really. Saw a
> book in Waterstones today that almost summed it up completely in
> the blurb...the read who the authour was
>
> DAVID ICKE
>
> Then realised I'm either a nutter for thinking what he was or
> that he is indeed the son of God (although I can understand his
> hatred of crosses...he was a goalie after all!).
>
> I wonder what the country would be like if we actually went back
> to our original pagan ways? Would we still have the wars we do
> now, or would it still be resorting to sacrificing to the pagan
> gods for a bountiful harvest and let them battle it out amongst
> themselves?

Believe me HM a lot of things were OK and made far more sense than today's bickering.....

I had my own theory that I could call my beliefs really. Saw a book in Waterstones today that almost summed it up completely in the blurb...the read who the authour was

DAVID ICKE

Then realised I'm either a nutter for thinking what he was or that he is indeed the son of God (although I can understand his hatred of crosses...he was a goalie after all!).

I wonder what the country would be like if we actually went back to our original pagan ways? Would we still have the wars we do now, or would it still be resorting to sacrificing to the pagan gods for a bountiful harvest and let them battle it out amongst themselves?

Warhunt wrote:
> Pretty much what I was saying. The bible states that there were
> sheperds in the fields during the birth, which only occured
> during spring-autumn. And the fact that Mary made a 70 mile
> journey whilst pregnant in the dead of Winter? More likely it was
> Sping or Autumn.
>
> That's the largest part. Still won't go into the story of Jesus
> and it's flaws. Too many, if you looked at it there is not one
> part of the story that is really "true" :S
>
> As true as religion can be if you don't believe etc etc

We are on the same side WH :-)