The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
But actually we live in the real world, and these are just dreams that will never come true, because those greedy developers only care about collecting money for themselves, and they wouldn't share it.
Sony are popular, as we have established, because of helpful circumstances.
Now with three players, Nintendo have more of a chance than ever to beat Sony and rise to the top.
> Sony are ahead of Nintendo simply because of Ninty's mistake in using
> cartridges for the N64, and the two year difference between the
> release of the PS2 and GameCube.
>
> Nintendo make the best games and with a good release date for the N5,
> they should attain an even stronger hold in the market.
Yes, I admit that. Final Fantasy 7, the game which started all this, was supposed to be released for N64, but because of using cartridge, it was released on Sony's console. And they released it in 1997. That's the year when ps1 was released in Egypt.But yet, we have to admit something else: This is what happened and we can't change it. Sony has already gone popular. Maybe this will change in the future as you have mentioned, but what's currently happening is that Sony are the successful ones. And that was the idea of the whole thread, that both companies have the best qualities, and merging would be useful.
But casual gamers are still humans - all they need is to be told what to do. FIFA is shoved in their faces at every turn, and as it is, to be fair, a nicely playable game, they'll love it. They won't like a blatently rubbish game, however.
If Nintendo keep making good games, with new ways to play rather than focusing on graphics, then it's bound to attract new people.
> And quality games will eventually result in financial success.
Well, that's not true.
See Fifa -enter year- vs. Ico.
Nintendo make the best games and with a good release date for the N5, they should attain an even stronger hold in the market.
> Oh no no no... you have nothing to back that up.
>
> Nintendo have sold far more consoles in their time than Sony. The
> Mario and Game Boy franchises are much more widespread than the
> Playstation brand.
>
> And quality games will eventually result in financial success.
First of all, I agree that Nintendo has sold at some point more than sony, since the gameboy was the console that sold most units in History, and next comes ps1. But then when you think about it, you'd fid that selling more doesn't necesserally indicate quality . Vice City sold most copies on PS2 than any other console game in History, does that make it best game ever ? Anyway success doesn't necesseraly indicate quality, but it's a factor, especially when it comes to third party companies. Nintendo IS better than Sony , but Sony are currently the ones who are actually accomplishing success.
Nintendo have sold far more consoles in their time than Sony. The Mario and Game Boy franchises are much more widespread than the Playstation brand.
And quality games will eventually result in financial success.
> Hardly. Nintendo are far more established in the industry than Sony.
>
> I'd say Nintendo's views are far different from that of either
> Microsoft or Sony. Fact is, they're staying in the home console
> business alone and will give Sony a difficult time in the next
> generation of consoles.
I wasn't talking about quality. I was talking about it financially, I mean to say that sony consoles are a lot more widely spread and popular in the video games market.
I'd say Nintendo's views are far different from that of either Microsoft or Sony. Fact is, they're staying in the home console business alone and will give Sony a difficult time in the next generation of consoles.