The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
After I stumbled upon Games GAD i found it quite amusing, but also was worried that it may cause some untruthful GAD attempts from all corners. What have I uncovered, a seedy trail of GAD winners who I do not believe for a second have the articulate prowess to write a proper sentence never minad a coherent argument or review!!!
Kermitboy, sorry to do this but, I think SR may wish to read this review http://www.gamezone.com/ gamesell/p11761.htm. You may find it is word for word exactly the same as Kermitboy's!!! Casa Nova has also written a good review of Extermination, but again I am highly suspicious and if anyone knows where the original can be found, post it.
I am all for the freedom of speech etc. but I am not willing to sit back and watch decent articles written by the likes of DAN2K1, not win because of people blatantly cheating. I know Game didn't do this, and SR made the mistake on that one, but the reviews are beyond the joke. Just read a few of them, especially by newbies and very few are capable of such a professional standard!!
I am shocked and appauled that such a decent scheme is being so blatanty ripped off by these vultures and I am quite sure SR will feel the same. Decent honest people put hours into writing really good posts and thene inarticulate wasters come along and use the copy and paste function to get a free game!!!
I am truely disheartened!!!
Bonus. :(
Don't you all think we should be contributing to good posts rather than bickering over something that we can't change?!
There are a handful of good posts out there... forget this GAD melachy and let the MI6-Monkeys sort it out tomorrow!
Game
I got one of the top 5 coursework
> folders (A* grade) in the year, as did Jd99. Don't tell him I told
> you. Also, I got a top 5 oral coursework! Yay!
I got the best DT folder in the country with EdExcel, I got 297 out of 300 for my DT coursework!
:)
> Awarding points to posts could become favouritism towards certain
> members.
Some people will automatically not rate someone's topic
> if they see the username next to it, whilst others will rate topics
> very highly if posted by a member they really like!
So I
> definately don't reccomend it!
i agree... just think of Sniper, he'd never get a GAD again
Finally someone apart from me has placed up a topic concerning the winners of GAD and it was Bonus the only person who bothered to fight with me a month ago about cheats winning GAD.
Its the same principal whether it be cheats winner or copied reviews winning, the fact is they are copied and are not worthy of the webspace they take up!
Have a look at some of the reviews written which have won a GAD, especially the reviews written by the winners who don't appear at all in the forums. These people see the 'winagameaday' competition as an easy thing to cheat in and win! I am 100% sure there are more reviews which have won have been copied and I beg people to check the recent and future winners and check there local gaming site to help SR!
Well done Bonus!
:)
???
Some people will automatically not rate someone's topic if they see the username next to it, whilst others will rate topics very highly if posted by a member they really like!
So I definately don't reccomend it!