GetDotted Domains

Viewing Thread:
"Gamecube VS Xbox"

The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.

Sat 14/08/04 at 15:32
Regular
"~DPG~"
Posts: 642
Go to the Nintendo forum. Go to the Gamecube VS Xbox debate. (read what i have said and see if you agree)


(i support Xbox by the way)
Tue 17/08/04 at 20:56
Regular
"ProGolfer"
Posts: 2,085
Edgy wrote:
> All we see is the final product. The cake that has been baked by these
> companies.
>
> If the cake tastes bad then it is rubbish and wont get eaten.
>
> It may sell well, but until it is tasted, we wont know how good it
> really is and how much effort went into it.
>
> If lots of effort did go into a bad cake, then maybe the makers of
> the cake should seek a new career.
>
> This metaphor business is making me hungry.

Ok was your point nintendo makes nice cakes :P I see what your saying but i think many other developers put the same amount of effort as Nintendo. To me GAME and SR are just cake shops.
Tue 17/08/04 at 20:13
Regular
Posts: 15,681
All we see is the final product. The cake that has been baked by these companies.

If the cake tastes bad then it is rubbish and wont get eaten.

It may sell well, but until it is tasted, we wont know how good it really is and how much effort went into it.

If lots of effort did go into a bad cake, then maybe the makers of the cake should seek a new career.

This metaphor business is making me hungry.
Tue 17/08/04 at 19:19
Regular
"ProGolfer"
Posts: 2,085
Edgy wrote:
> True, Microsoft do release some good stuff. I'm not going to argue
> against that.
>
> I still feel that Nintendo puts that little bit more effort into
> games than Microsoft. I'm sure Microsoft will change that in the
> future - for example if their Rare team make a few more games a
> little quicker, they'd develop a much bigger reputation for excellent
> quality games. But as it stands, I can only name a few classics (not
> as in budget games) that they've made.

Ok i agree with some of that. But i dont feel that some companys put in more or less effort in to there games. They probably do but you or me cannot judge such a thing. All we see is the front door...
Tue 17/08/04 at 18:43
Regular
Posts: 15,681
True, Microsoft do release some good stuff. I'm not going to argue against that.

I still feel that Nintendo puts that little bit more effort into games than Microsoft. I'm sure Microsoft will change that in the future - for example if their Rare team make a few more games a little quicker, they'd develop a much bigger reputation for excellent quality games. But as it stands, I can only name a few classics (not as in budget games) that they've made.
Tue 17/08/04 at 18:35
Regular
"ProGolfer"
Posts: 2,085
Edgy wrote:
> Exactly. Most of what Nintendo churns out is decent.
>
> However some companies bring out tat and rarely anything but tat.
>
>
> That's the Nintendo difference.

Yeh but i think Microsoft churns out some good games. Some publishers may release tat but not all. So Nintendo is diffrent to all the game companys.
Tue 17/08/04 at 18:21
Regular
Posts: 15,681
Exactly. Most of what Nintendo churns out is decent.

However some companies bring out tat and rarely anything but tat.


That's the Nintendo difference.
Tue 17/08/04 at 17:22
Regular
"ProGolfer"
Posts: 2,085
Edgy wrote:
> Yes, and they've paid the price for it.
>
> But it isn't to say that the Game Boy games were bad. Just the
> prices.
>
> No one has said that Nintendo aren't trying to earn money. They're
> trying to earn money as well as to feel pride in their work.
> Otherwise, how else are they going to justify spending money on the
> resources in the company.

Nintendo is no different from any other company who makes games, yes they like them all companys do its its source fo profit.

> However, you look at Sony and the Eye Toy. Good idea, terrible games
> so far. The only decent one being Kung Foo so far.

Yeh well lets face it, its crap.
Tue 17/08/04 at 17:10
Regular
Posts: 15,681
Yes, and they've paid the price for it.

But it isn't to say that the Game Boy games were bad. Just the prices.

No one has said that Nintendo aren't trying to earn money. They're trying to earn money as well as to feel pride in their work. Otherwise, how else are they going to justify spending money on the resources in the company.

However, you look at Sony and the Eye Toy. Good idea, terrible games so far. The only decent one being Kung Foo so far.
Tue 17/08/04 at 16:13
Regular
"ProGolfer"
Posts: 2,085
Edgy wrote:
> The quality of game for one.

Back to your view on games on diffrent console. I mean Nintendo dont love it all the time they were sued 2 years ago milllions because of price fixing in Europe they stuck up the price to make extra money as they new they could with the gameboy.
Tue 17/08/04 at 16:12
Regular
"ProGolfer"
Posts: 2,085
Edgy wrote:
> The quality of game for one.

Back to your view on games on diffrent console.

Freeola & GetDotted are rated 5 Stars

Check out some of our customer reviews below:

The coolest ISP ever!
In my opinion, the ISP is the best I have ever used. They guarantee 'first time connection - everytime', which they have never let me down on.
Continue this excellent work...
Brilliant! As usual the careful and intuitive production that Freeola puts into everything it sets out to do, I am delighted.

View More Reviews

Need some help? Give us a call on 01376 55 60 60

Go to Support Centre

It appears you are using an old browser, as such, some parts of the Freeola and Getdotted site will not work as intended. Using the latest version of your browser, or another browser such as Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox, or Opera will provide a better, safer browsing experience for you.