Viewing Thread:
"stupid bloody kids paper game"

i cant finish paper mario 2, and its a kids game!!!!
after it does the thing with all the stars and everyone says go mario go, and you have to fight the demon again,
no matter how much i hit the focker, it wont die!!!
does anyone know how to beat it easily??

Russ81 wrote:
> i already have, some love it, some hated it.
> Either way, a review matters not it comes down to anybody's own
> opinion really.

Thanks for saving my time. :)

i already have, some love it, some hated it.
Either way, a review matters not it comes down to anybody's own opinion really.
Reckon i'm the only person who ever liked thunderhawk 2:firestorm on the saturn, despite it getting complete rubbish reviews

Russ81 wrote:
> But now, paper mario is to be traded in at gamestation, and I'll move
> on to Star fox assault. It had best be good cos i loved lylat wars,
> and i don't want the precious mmories of how good that was taken away
> by a crap follow-up

I suggest you read some reviews on it then...

I've finished it now at last.
ok, I'll admit that it was enjoyable and it did make me unearth the old SNES and play mario all-stars for a bit!

But now, paper mario is to be traded in at gamestation, and I'll move on to Star fox assault. It had best be good cos i loved lylat wars, and i don't want the precious mmories of how good that was taken away by a crap follow-up

I really hate it when people say Nintendo's games are for kids.

It's just stupid, rubbish ignorance and takes credit away from what is often art from them.

Ah, the Paper Luigi story was very entertaining :D

What I totally loved about Paper Mario 2 is the amazing script. I mean, the game actually made me laugh, and it's just so down to earth - none of that technical crap you tend to get in Baten Kaitos or KOTOR.

Thanks Dring, I'm gonna have to review it now ;)

Smashes the original Paper Mario into the ground. The Glitzville was a great story telling level... I really enjoyed the way it was presented.

As I also enjoyed listening to the jokes the crows mate, or the "Paper Luigi" story... or that fantastic desert island level... or doing those helpful chores for the locals... or discovering the secrets of the towns..

Bar that level where you had to keep backtracking... I REALLLLLLY loved the game. More so than Paper Mario... much more so.

Dringo wrote:
> I'm thinking of starting the game again... if only for the glitzville
> level.

Yeah, because that wasn't lazily done AT ALL. Fight after fight after fight...

Admittedly, the game was far too easy, but so what if it was this damn good? There was more than enough stuff to keep you involved and the amount of replay value was, surprisingly, pretty high. Didn't really enjoy doing errands for the townsfolk, though.

But with all honesty, it doesn't match to the original Paper Mario game. By all means, it's fantastic, but the level design and puzzles were far better in the original. It had more charm too, and once beaten you couldn't resist to mess about in the town.

Ah. Good days.

Dringo wrote:
> Short? Easy, granted... but short?

Most games usually take me ages to beat. This only took me 50-odd hours. That's with Troubles and such sidequests. I got it for my birthday(November 16) and beat it sometime in December, I think. I loved every bit of it! Well... except for the back-tracking in Twilight Town.

Short? Easy, granted... but short?