Viewing Thread:
"Jurassic Park"

Just won a set off ebay (1 2&3)

I really like being frightened by dinosaurs!
What do you think of them?

JFH wrote:
> The same can be said for so many films.

True but sometimes like Aliens the second one was the better film, also i personally consider the matrix films as complete rubbish as a whole and the same with jurassic park, thats why i only own the first ones. the alien series on the other hand was fantastic on the whole (bar AvP) and so Aliens was the best of a great bunch.

Yeah, that's right, "sequales".

Chippxero wrote:
> they should have just done the first one and then stopped

The same can be said for so many films.

I enjoyed the sequales to the Matrix.
The third one sucked a bit up until the robots attacked, then sucked a bit ore once they stopped though.

I think jurassic park is much like the matrix, they should have just done the first one and then stopped, and they would have been held in much higher regard by most people.

And of course there's no people (or if there are, they're all eaten/lasered), no story, adn just 90 minutes of dinosaurs hunting each otehr and killing each otehr.

MoJoJoJo wrote:
> I heard rumours about number four involving super dinosaurs being made
> to counter the normal dinosaurs attacking mainland America. It
> involved dinosaurs wearing armour and being ordered around by some
> bloke.
>
> Sounded terrible, hopefully it WAS just a rumour...

That sounds like my kind of film.

Bio-dinosaurs versus robo dinosaurs.

Would be great, but ONLY if the robo dinosaurs are the evil ones, and they have lasers.
And the bio-dinosaurs win.

The horrible thing is that it seems to be impossible to find a copy of the first Jurrasic Park on DVD that isn't bundled with its sequels.

FinalFantasyFanatic wrote:
> Wrong, Bobbo. The first one rules, the second one sucked, and the
> third one sucked, but not nearly as much as the second one.

Agreed

The Lost World book was better than the Jurassic Park book, however

The first is the best