The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
This thread has been linked to the game 'Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas'.
So stop running around all giddy like you're on acid talking about how could it will be "coz you can go on a push bike!!11"
You have to eat to stay alive. You can get haircuts. Two of the most mundane things in life and yet the PS2 Magazines are full of spanked up fanboys raving about how amazing it is and how it'll be such a great gaming experience. The graphics look shoddy and it will probably be a huge mass of crapness, a solitary player wallowing in this colossal map that's full of buldings and land that all looks the same.
Nevertheless, I'll probably still get it.
You have to eat to stay alive. You can get haircuts. Two of the most mundane things in life and yet the PS2 Magazines are full of spanked up fanboys raving about how amazing it is and how it'll be such a great gaming experience. The graphics look shoddy and it will probably be a huge mass of crapness, a solitary player wallowing in this colossal map that's full of buldings and land that all looks the same.
Nevertheless, I'll probably still get it.
Page:
Ahahaha.
Nash got told.
Nash got told.
Yeah but Nash = ultimate.
Jonathan Nash wrote:
> I'm going to balls your mother in a minute.
No wonder your warned you have a go at everyone!
> I'm going to balls your mother in a minute.
No wonder your warned you have a go at everyone!
SA has ragdoll? HOLY HELL!
Exactly - the size of the game is commendable.
All the other new stuff is superficial rubbish.
All the other new stuff is superficial rubbish.
It is 99% gimmick. That makes me sad.
Why not design 1, decent city and pick up the framerate and graphical effect. A decent aiming system, good loading times, wider object loading.
Take ragdoll from SA onwards - everything else should be left in the pit of crap it crawled from.
Yes, ragdoll should be fun. As long as there's a zero-gravity cheat.
And none of that cheats-fecking-game-up shiznit. I got my 100% in VC, then was too scared to have some fun in case I lost it.
I'll bet all this cockwash was thought up by 1 man - in GTA3 he gets a simple project, the stamina meter thingy. In VC he gets promoted to the cheats department. Now he's head honcho and handing out horsecrap like it's going out of fashion.
Yus.
Why not design 1, decent city and pick up the framerate and graphical effect. A decent aiming system, good loading times, wider object loading.
Take ragdoll from SA onwards - everything else should be left in the pit of crap it crawled from.
Yes, ragdoll should be fun. As long as there's a zero-gravity cheat.
And none of that cheats-fecking-game-up shiznit. I got my 100% in VC, then was too scared to have some fun in case I lost it.
I'll bet all this cockwash was thought up by 1 man - in GTA3 he gets a simple project, the stamina meter thingy. In VC he gets promoted to the cheats department. Now he's head honcho and handing out horsecrap like it's going out of fashion.
Yus.
I'm pretty sure I'll love it.
It probably won't be bad, just I'll detest it even more.
Becuase it appears to be more of the same utterly insipid ugly-shoddy superficial feature-ridden game, just on a far larger scale, complete with inane shootouts and yet more Rockstar innuendo.
Becuase it appears to be more of the same utterly insipid ugly-shoddy superficial feature-ridden game, just on a far larger scale, complete with inane shootouts and yet more Rockstar innuendo.
But I've still ordered it?
Poor me ...
Poor me ...
I agree that the eating thing sucks, but let's actually wait til it's out and we can play it for ourselves before we rip it to mighty hell.
Page: