Viewing Thread:
"Revolution specs..?"

You've more then likly sread this somewhere already but...


Two 1.8ghz G5 based cpus
600mhz ATI gpu with 12mb onboard
128mb 1tsram
256mb dram

These specs came from What I hear are good sources, that where on the nail with 360 /PS3 info. If they are near the truth then it doesent sound that bad really (for the guts of it anyway). But one thing, if ATI have made that graphics part for consoles why isnt the 360 using it?

Hedfix wrote:
> Actually I was backing your sarcasm up but write another defensive
> paragraph if you'd like.

I thought you were, but I didn't wanna say anything.

Sounds all a little daft to me.

I was being serious! I want one in blue........that I can control the games with an implant in the frontal lobe!

Actually I was backing your sarcasm up but write another defensive paragraph if you'd like.

Hedfix wrote:
> Memorandum! wrote:
>
> hilariously expensive
>
> Hedfix wrote:
> I laughed exactly 0 times.
>
> And you weren't trying to be funny.

Indeed I wasn't...I was trying to be serious in this thread and explain why those rumours were complete bs. I was doing the same in that post. You should know "hilariously ..." is just a figure of speech. There was no need to make a weak, pathetic attempt at trolling using an inconsequential comment. Some of us would rather actually discuss things rather than provoke argument.

Now if you'll excuse me I have to be out in the real world.

But not in the limp-wristed gerrid way.

gerrid wrote:
> Listen, merm, if you're too much of a child to figure it out I'm not
> going to tell you. Go back and read it over again you'll figure it
> out.

Oh the ironing.

Memorandum! wrote:
>
> hilariously expensive

Hedfix wrote:
> I laughed exactly 0 times.

And you weren't trying to be funny.

Listen, merm, if you're too much of a child to figure it out I'm not going to tell you. Go back and read it over again you'll figure it out.

All computers do that, it's just a way with coping with a lack of physical memory. It is also a bad, bad way, because RAM is 1000+ times faster than a disk.

And when exactly was I trying to be funny?
I've read back and I'm at a complete loss.

No idea, I was replying to Memo's post about a certain non-funny post that was made earlier.

Yours wasn't funny either though.

Unless Gwizz was being serious... nah.

Incidentally if you're on about the program on my old RISC PC, I believe it did use the HD to keep programs in limbo so more could run or something.