The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
[URL]http://www.theshiznit.co.uk[/URL]
Got a new guy writing stuff for the site, an American dude called Chris. He's pretty cool, he likes lists. Don't we all? So enjoy his list of the Top 10 Sci-fi movies of all time, and feel free to disagree vehemently in the comments section so I can totally see how popular I am.
Personally? I've seen two of the top ten. Whoops. I'm quite lame when it comes to Sci-fi. I'm always gonna argue for Jurassic Park to be in any list of top whatevers, just cos it rules.
For Goaty: the most audacious opening shot ever, I cried at Eternal Sunshine, etc etc etc. Your own little paragraph.
Got a new guy writing stuff for the site, an American dude called Chris. He's pretty cool, he likes lists. Don't we all? So enjoy his list of the Top 10 Sci-fi movies of all time, and feel free to disagree vehemently in the comments section so I can totally see how popular I am.
Personally? I've seen two of the top ten. Whoops. I'm quite lame when it comes to Sci-fi. I'm always gonna argue for Jurassic Park to be in any list of top whatevers, just cos it rules.
For Goaty: the most audacious opening shot ever, I cried at Eternal Sunshine, etc etc etc. Your own little paragraph.
Page:
Cool.
Tiltawhirl wrote:
> It was nothing more than an average film, good but nothing amazing.
It's very dirivative, but worth it alone for the teeth firing bone gun. It wouldn't make my top 10, but it wouldn't be far off.
Speaking of which, Hedfix, Cronenburgs latest, "A History Of Voilence" is getting good reviews.
> It was nothing more than an average film, good but nothing amazing.
It's very dirivative, but worth it alone for the teeth firing bone gun. It wouldn't make my top 10, but it wouldn't be far off.
Speaking of which, Hedfix, Cronenburgs latest, "A History Of Voilence" is getting good reviews.
That was just a quick list.
But yeah I preferred it to every Star Wars movie I've seen.
But yeah I preferred it to every Star Wars movie I've seen.
Hedfix wrote:
> It just doesn't deserve to feature in a top 10 of sci-fi.
Yet Existenz does?
It was nothing more than an average film, good but nothing amazing.
> It just doesn't deserve to feature in a top 10 of sci-fi.
Yet Existenz does?
It was nothing more than an average film, good but nothing amazing.
monkey_man wrote:
> The why has it never been on the Sci-Fi channel?
They don't have the rights.
> The why has it never been on the Sci-Fi channel?
They don't have the rights.
monkey_man wrote:
> The why has it never been on the Sci-Fi channel?
Because Lita 3000 > Star Wars, duh!
> The why has it never been on the Sci-Fi channel?
Because Lita 3000 > Star Wars, duh!
Star Wars is sci-fi.
It just doesn't deserve to feature in a top 10 of sci-fi.
It just doesn't deserve to feature in a top 10 of sci-fi.
That wasn't even a proper sentence
The why has it never been on the Sci-Fi channel?
Star Wars is sci-fi Star Wars is sci-fi Star Wars is sci-fi Star Wars is sci-fi Star Wars is sci-fi Star Wars is sci-fi Star Wars is sci-fi Star Wars is sci-fi Star Wars is sci-fi Star Wars is sci-fi Star Wars is sci-fi Star Wars is sci-fi Star Wars is sci-fi Star Wars is sci-fi Star Wars is sci-fi Star Wars is sci-fi Star Wars is sci-fi Star Wars is sci-fi Star Wars is sci-fi Star Wars is sci-fi Star Wars is sci-fi Star Wars is sci-fi Star Wars is sci-fi Star Wars is sci-fi Star Wars is sci-fi Star Wars is sci-fi Star Wars is sci-fi Star Wars is sci-fi Star Wars is sci-fi Star Wars is sci-fi Star Wars is sci-fi Star Wars is sci-fi Star Wars is sci-fi Star Wars is sci-fi Star Wars is sci-fi Star Wars is sci-fi
Page: