The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Michael Shields has been sentenced to 15 years prison for a crime he DID NOT commit. [URL]http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/merseyside/4720583.stm[/URL] for a BBC report on his story. The sentence relates to the attempted murder of a waitor - a crime which another Brit has since admitted. I have signed this petition and would strongly recommend you do the same. Please pass the link around via e-mail. The link is [URL]http://www.petitiononline.com/shields1/petition.html[/URL]
Thanks,
Forest Fan
Thanks,
Forest Fan
Page:
316 3055 wrote:
> If he isn't, he should take the sentence as 'credit' for crimes he
> will surely commit in the future.
You're an idiot.
> If he isn't, he should take the sentence as 'credit' for crimes he
> will surely commit in the future.
You're an idiot.
Can you all stop this idiotic nonsense please: [URL]http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/merseyside/4732829.stm[/URL]
The victim identified him as the attacker, and the bloke in England looking for love in a foreign prison said he threw a brick at a crowd, not directly attacking the person, or seeing it hit him.
End. Of. Story.
EDIT: Although it would be hilarious if they jailed him too for throwing a brick.
"In the confession, electrician Mr Sankey said he threw a brick at a group of people when he saw a fight."
WTF? Baboon! BABOON!
The victim identified him as the attacker, and the bloke in England looking for love in a foreign prison said he threw a brick at a crowd, not directly attacking the person, or seeing it hit him.
End. Of. Story.
EDIT: Although it would be hilarious if they jailed him too for throwing a brick.
"In the confession, electrician Mr Sankey said he threw a brick at a group of people when he saw a fight."
WTF? Baboon! BABOON!
How can you trust the barman after a piece of his brain was left exposed after the attack?
Shields wasn't even wearing a white shirt that night, not to mention he was never at the scene.
Shields wasn't even wearing a white shirt that night, not to mention he was never at the scene.
Proof?
Besides internet speculation and the babblings of a man who thought he'd got away with dashing the brains of a foreigner all over the floor?
Besides internet speculation and the babblings of a man who thought he'd got away with dashing the brains of a foreigner all over the floor?
Firstly m_m_, read this
[URL]http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/merseyside/4725495.stm[/URL]
On the one hand you have Sankey pleading his guilt, admitting full responsibilty but just not wanting to go to Bulgarian prison and on the other hand there's Shield's who has always protested his innocence.
The Bulgarian courts weren't interested in the stack of evidence that Shield's was innocent, including hotel records showing he was in his room at the time of the alleged attacks and evidence from friends including photographs at the time, because Shields was snoring so loudly that night.
[URL]http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/merseyside/4725495.stm[/URL]
On the one hand you have Sankey pleading his guilt, admitting full responsibilty but just not wanting to go to Bulgarian prison and on the other hand there's Shield's who has always protested his innocence.
The Bulgarian courts weren't interested in the stack of evidence that Shield's was innocent, including hotel records showing he was in his room at the time of the alleged attacks and evidence from friends including photographs at the time, because Shields was snoring so loudly that night.
but could that mean he didn't cause the injuries - maybe he hit somebody else (not as seriously) and they haven't said anything because they were involved and provoked an attack?
Shields is innocent of any crime, he was never at the scene but was in his hotel room. The uncivilised Bulgarian courts just wanted a scape goat.
I haven't read anything anywhere that mentions hotel records, being told to wear a white T-shirt, or the air-tight alibi that he was snoring.
stupid savage foreigners!!
He looks shifty, and that's good enough evidence for me.
He looks shifty, and that's good enough evidence for me.
hippyman wrote:
> but could that mean he didn't cause the injuries - maybe he hit
> somebody else (not as seriously) and they haven't said anything
> because they were involved and provoked an attack?
Exactly. The confession of a drunkard means nothing when other (not drunk) people pointed out someone else.
> but could that mean he didn't cause the injuries - maybe he hit
> somebody else (not as seriously) and they haven't said anything
> because they were involved and provoked an attack?
Exactly. The confession of a drunkard means nothing when other (not drunk) people pointed out someone else.
Page: