Viewing Thread:
"Not again?"

3 tube station closed because of "incidents"
Anybody know what's going on, or is it just precaution?

Undercover police that don't have to announce that they are police.

I do think they are right to shoot people who they suspect, it’s just from what witnesses have said there wasn’t a need to shoot him.

Running from armed police in a terrorism hotspot is pretty dumb.

Head police guy said it doesn't look likely and that he regretted the death, to me that says ‘we are willing to shoot people and say we are wrong, but maybe we won’t shoot straight away next time.’

Has it been officially said whether he had a bomb or not? I wouldn't go by the musings of Sky News, or ITV if I were you. Even BBC 24 had some squawking bint that EMPHASISED every OTHER word TO make IT sound MORE bloody SCARY.

Question is why did he feel the need to run?

If a guy with a gun in a station wants to kill you, he's going to kill you.

Were these guys firing at everyone? No.

So why run just because they have guns?

A possiblity but, the guy didn't have a bomb which means he was just running away from the guys with guns.

Chippxero wrote:
> Also if you plan to blow something up, a undercover cop tells you to
> stop, you set off your expolsives.

Or you try to run to your intended target now that your cover has been blown.

Depends if they got spooked.

Also if you plan to blow something up, a undercover cop tells you to stop, you set off your expolsives.

But surely real terrorists would know that, so would continue as 'normal' people until they got onto their train.