The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Just watching the news, and the whole of the london underground has been shut due to an series of explosions.
A bus has also exploded in london.
A bus has also exploded in london.
Page:
Game wrote:
> I am not a Nazi, a racist or an MP. I am an English citizen, care for
> my country and have an opinion on what the London bombings entailed.
-----------
"Britain was at its strongest when we hung people, had a great army and ruled from the throne with integrity"
If ANY of these Muslim extremists are caught, they should be hung until they're almost dead, kneecapped and then shotgunned in the face.
We can't be all weak against terrorism. This is England, this is our home... If these particular Muslims want a fight, we'll give them a fight.
If there isn't a civil war between English people and these Muslims in the next 5 years, i'll be quite suprised"
> I am not a Nazi, a racist or an MP. I am an English citizen, care for
> my country and have an opinion on what the London bombings entailed.
-----------
"Britain was at its strongest when we hung people, had a great army and ruled from the throne with integrity"
If ANY of these Muslim extremists are caught, they should be hung until they're almost dead, kneecapped and then shotgunned in the face.
We can't be all weak against terrorism. This is England, this is our home... If these particular Muslims want a fight, we'll give them a fight.
If there isn't a civil war between English people and these Muslims in the next 5 years, i'll be quite suprised"
I'm also noting the extensive use of, "this is England" by Game, rather than Britain
NATIONALISTIC SON OF A GUN!!!11
NATIONALISTIC SON OF A GUN!!!11
Only for the BNP.
Are you Kilroy Silk?
Are you Kilroy Silk?
HE'S NOT BEING FUNNY, SUNSHINE
Goatboy wrote:
>And you have, yet again, avoided the points I raised in my previous post.
I'd make a good politician, then. Haha..
>And you have, yet again, avoided the points I raised in my previous post.
I'd make a good politician, then. Haha..
Haha! Yeah because it was Goatboy who had the kneejerk racist reaction wasn't it?
Game wrote:
> Makes you sick, doesn't it.
>
> People who intentionally bring misery and suffering to peoples
> lives.
>
> If ANY of these Muslim extremists are caught, they should be hung
> until they're almost dead, kneecapped and then shotgunned in the
> face.
>
> We can't be all weak against terrorism. This is England, this is our
> home... If these particular Muslims want a fight, we'll give them a
> fight.
>
> If there isn't a civil war between English people and these Muslims
> in the next 5 years, i'll be quite suprised.
*chuckle*
> Makes you sick, doesn't it.
>
> People who intentionally bring misery and suffering to peoples
> lives.
>
> If ANY of these Muslim extremists are caught, they should be hung
> until they're almost dead, kneecapped and then shotgunned in the
> face.
>
> We can't be all weak against terrorism. This is England, this is our
> home... If these particular Muslims want a fight, we'll give them a
> fight.
>
> If there isn't a civil war between English people and these Muslims
> in the next 5 years, i'll be quite suprised.
*chuckle*
I'm not being funny, Sunshine. But the chances that Muslim extremists did it are very high indeed.
If you're all waiting for me to suggest that we hang every single Muslim in the UK after force-feeding them pork and insulting them with a tirade of abuse, then i'm afraid you'll be sorely disappointed. If you're resetting your back legs waiting to pounce when I announce that all 'Pakíes' in the UK should be injected with acid and gassed, then again, you'll be disappointed. None of the above will happen.
Racism is wrong. It's clearly evident in todays society and it's something that I personally hope dies as soon as it can. However, my opinion on the London blasts and who carried out the attack stands; I believe that radical Muslim extremists carried out the attack with the intention of causing confusion, death, injury, panic and distress.
I am not a Nazi, a racist or an MP. I am an English citizen, care for my country and have an opinion on what the London bombings entailed.
If you're all waiting for me to suggest that we hang every single Muslim in the UK after force-feeding them pork and insulting them with a tirade of abuse, then i'm afraid you'll be sorely disappointed. If you're resetting your back legs waiting to pounce when I announce that all 'Pakíes' in the UK should be injected with acid and gassed, then again, you'll be disappointed. None of the above will happen.
Racism is wrong. It's clearly evident in todays society and it's something that I personally hope dies as soon as it can. However, my opinion on the London blasts and who carried out the attack stands; I believe that radical Muslim extremists carried out the attack with the intention of causing confusion, death, injury, panic and distress.
I am not a Nazi, a racist or an MP. I am an English citizen, care for my country and have an opinion on what the London bombings entailed.
Game wrote:
> You don't know half of what goes on inside the Houses of Parliment,
> behind closed doors. You don't what type of extremist people are in
> the counrty, their past, their intentions. I don't either. You, like
> me and millions of others, have a skin-deep knowledge of the
> intricacies of how things are run.
I will say that I have a better working knowledge of government and their actions around the world than you do.
There is a world of difference discussing how I percieve the actions of our governments, using supporting links to outside websites, and coming up with racist bilge like "Britain was at its strongest when we hung people, had a great army and ruled from the throne with integrity"
> Such as you've formed an opinion based on what you've read and what
> other people think. I don't have the ability to print-screen and link
> to pages you've seen because I don't know.
Well that kind of blows your argument out of the water now doesn't it?
"I can't...because I don't know" - so where exactly have you got the opinion that I form my ideas from internet blogs and friends then?
Ah yes, "I don't know"
>But it's clear to me that
> your opinion is a melding of political correctness and the status quo
> mindset of the younger generation.
"Status quo mindset of the younger generation"
Really? Because me and my teen mates hang around parks shouting about Bush is that it? Or possibly because...I don't know...I sit around at college and spout stuff I heard in politics the other day?
I would say that my opinion is far from political correctness. If you cast your mind back 3 years to the build-up to the Iraq invasion, there was myself and a couple of others going against the PC version of events, much to the declemation of these forums and others.
> In the way that you continually criticise Bush and Blair when you
> have about .05% knowledge of what is going on around the world. If
> you were to run the country, I fear we'd be in a far worse state than
> we are now.
And why do you feel the country would be in a far worse state?
It's no good just issuing blanket statements with "I don't know" caveats on, you need to explain why you think these things.
Yes I continually criticise Bush & Blair, because their actions and consquences have done, and continue to, harm the planet.
Should I not speak out when I feel the leaders we elect to fulfill our desires act as demagogues? Should I blindly agree to policies and actions that I feel are wrong, simply because I am not a member of government?
> You have your opinions, friend.. and not once, before today, have I
> criticised you for them. But to criticise me and my opinions of fact,
> when they're supported as well they are, is stupid.
"Me and my opinions of fact when they're supported as well they are"
Quite apart from the grammatical mangling of that sentence, everybody here jumped on you for idiot statements such as, I repeat
"Britain was at its strongest when we hung people, had a great army and ruled from the throne with integrity" and "If there isn't a civil war between English people and these Muslims in the next 5 years, i'll be quite suprised."
It's hardly Newsnight level of intellect is it now?
And you have, yet again, avoided the points I raised in my previous post.
> You don't know half of what goes on inside the Houses of Parliment,
> behind closed doors. You don't what type of extremist people are in
> the counrty, their past, their intentions. I don't either. You, like
> me and millions of others, have a skin-deep knowledge of the
> intricacies of how things are run.
I will say that I have a better working knowledge of government and their actions around the world than you do.
There is a world of difference discussing how I percieve the actions of our governments, using supporting links to outside websites, and coming up with racist bilge like "Britain was at its strongest when we hung people, had a great army and ruled from the throne with integrity"
> Such as you've formed an opinion based on what you've read and what
> other people think. I don't have the ability to print-screen and link
> to pages you've seen because I don't know.
Well that kind of blows your argument out of the water now doesn't it?
"I can't...because I don't know" - so where exactly have you got the opinion that I form my ideas from internet blogs and friends then?
Ah yes, "I don't know"
>But it's clear to me that
> your opinion is a melding of political correctness and the status quo
> mindset of the younger generation.
"Status quo mindset of the younger generation"
Really? Because me and my teen mates hang around parks shouting about Bush is that it? Or possibly because...I don't know...I sit around at college and spout stuff I heard in politics the other day?
I would say that my opinion is far from political correctness. If you cast your mind back 3 years to the build-up to the Iraq invasion, there was myself and a couple of others going against the PC version of events, much to the declemation of these forums and others.
> In the way that you continually criticise Bush and Blair when you
> have about .05% knowledge of what is going on around the world. If
> you were to run the country, I fear we'd be in a far worse state than
> we are now.
And why do you feel the country would be in a far worse state?
It's no good just issuing blanket statements with "I don't know" caveats on, you need to explain why you think these things.
Yes I continually criticise Bush & Blair, because their actions and consquences have done, and continue to, harm the planet.
Should I not speak out when I feel the leaders we elect to fulfill our desires act as demagogues? Should I blindly agree to policies and actions that I feel are wrong, simply because I am not a member of government?
> You have your opinions, friend.. and not once, before today, have I
> criticised you for them. But to criticise me and my opinions of fact,
> when they're supported as well they are, is stupid.
"Me and my opinions of fact when they're supported as well they are"
Quite apart from the grammatical mangling of that sentence, everybody here jumped on you for idiot statements such as, I repeat
"Britain was at its strongest when we hung people, had a great army and ruled from the throne with integrity" and "If there isn't a civil war between English people and these Muslims in the next 5 years, i'll be quite suprised."
It's hardly Newsnight level of intellect is it now?
And you have, yet again, avoided the points I raised in my previous post.
Haha...
Page: