The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Just watching the news, and the whole of the london underground has been shut due to an series of explosions.
A bus has also exploded in london.
A bus has also exploded in london.
Page:
Ahaha, go team Game.
Yeah, mate, we were stronger back in the day when we killed people for no good reason, invaded countries and took them for our own and kept those blackies out of our land, or else made them do out work for us.
Stronger? Yes.
Better? Er ... no.
Do shut up, you ignorant cockshank.
Yeah, mate, we were stronger back in the day when we killed people for no good reason, invaded countries and took them for our own and kept those blackies out of our land, or else made them do out work for us.
Stronger? Yes.
Better? Er ... no.
Do shut up, you ignorant cockshank.
Game wrote:
> small_brown_todger53 wrote:
> Holy ignorant, mis-informed xenophobic racist much
>
> Shouldn't you be at playgroup, or something?
No mate, it's the summer holidays!
Shouldn't you be parading around in a white hood while clutching onto the Daily Mail and a cross?
> small_brown_todger53 wrote:
> Holy ignorant, mis-informed xenophobic racist much
>
> Shouldn't you be at playgroup, or something?
No mate, it's the summer holidays!
Shouldn't you be parading around in a white hood while clutching onto the Daily Mail and a cross?
Memorandum! wrote:
> monkey_man wrote:
> What's going on?
>
> "If there isn't a civil war between English people and these
> Muslims in the next 5 years, i'll be quite suprised."
I agree. :P
> monkey_man wrote:
> What's going on?
>
> "If there isn't a civil war between English people and these
> Muslims in the next 5 years, i'll be quite suprised."
I agree. :P
small_brown_todger53 wrote:
> Holy ignorant, mis-informed xenophobic racist much
Shouldn't you be at playgroup, or something?
> Holy ignorant, mis-informed xenophobic racist much
Shouldn't you be at playgroup, or something?
monkey_man wrote:
> What's going on?
"If there isn't a civil war between English people and these Muslims in the next 5 years, i'll be quite suprised."
> What's going on?
"If there isn't a civil war between English people and these Muslims in the next 5 years, i'll be quite suprised."
Holy ignorant, mis-informed xenophobic racist much
He's older he must be right!!!1
What's going on?
What's going on?
Mate...Goatboy is like 30 something
Game wrote:
> what you hear in your A-Level politics
mate, Goatboy is about 30.
> what you hear in your A-Level politics
mate, Goatboy is about 30.
Goatboy wrote:
> Goatboy wrote:
>
> I will say that I have a better working knowledge of government and
> their actions around the world than you do.
> There is a world of difference discussing how I percieve the actions
> of our governments, using supporting links to outside websites, and
> coming up with racist bilge like "Britain was at its strongest
> when we hung people, had a great army and ruled from the throne with
> integrity"
Granted, you may know more than me, but you certainly know anything that the government don't want you to. You many well know about the US cutting oil supplies, or Britian doing this or that, but the 100% of stuff you know is probably only around 5% of what actually goes on.
Well that kind of blows your argument out of the water now doesn't
> it?
> "I can't...because I don't know" - so where exactly have
> you got the opinion that I form my ideas from internet blogs and
> friends then?
> Ah yes, "I don't know"
So it's not true? Honestly? Newspapers lie, so do internet sites. You read reports and posts on the internet. The internet is full of ballucks. You don't know for sure that your opinion or what you say is 100% true.
> "Status quo mindset of the younger generation"
> Really? ..... of these forums and others.
I wasn't around when you were talking about the Iraq invasion. Also, what you hear in your A-Level politics is nothing on the scale of things. From your comments, your mindset seems like a modern one, and one which consists neither of individuality or patriotism.
> And why do you feel the country would be in a far worse state?
> It's no good just issuing blanket statements with "I don't
> know" caveats on, you need to explain why you think these
> things. Yes I continually criticise Bush & Blair, because their actions
> and consquences have done, and continue to, harm the planet.
> Should I not speak out when I feel the leaders we elect to fulfill
> our desires act as demagogues? Should I blindly agree to policies
> and actions that I feel are wrong, simply because I am not a member of
> government?
The country would be in a FAR worse state because you don't know anything about running a country. As for your 'harm the Planet' I understand this to be a environmental comment... i'd like to see you balance the economy of a country by getting everyone to walk from Birmingham to London to work. Can't drive a car? Okay, that's all the VAT from selling cars off the next budget. Can't buy petrol? There's another wedge gone. If your planet argument was a political one, then fine. What's the problem? Saddam Hussein is in captivity. He was a tyrant and murderer. Iraq will take time to heal, Rome wasn't built in a day so a country will obviously take years.
> "Me and my opinions of fact when they're supported as well they
> are" Quite apart from the grammatical mangling of that sentence,
> everybody here jumped on you for idiot statements such as, I repeat
> "Britain was at its strongest when we hung people, had a great
> army and ruled from the throne with integrity" and "If
> there isn't a civil war between English people and these Muslims in
> the next 5 years, i'll be quite suprised."
And what?! There was nothing much wrong witht at sentence for a start. Try leaving the commas in, next time. And Britain was stronger back then. We shouldn't have nations scared of us, but definitely fear us (as in repsect). The problem nowadays, is that these Eastern European and Asian immigrants flock in because they think they can just come here and do what they want. Britain shouldn't be a place where they come, get a free house, get hundred of pounds of benefit a month and du feck all. If they want to come here they should work, share houses and there should be a definite limit of say 20,000 a year. They should get enough to eat, sleep be awrm and drink, not have Sky-TV and a car. We have BRITISH people on our own streets who are starving. We should address this first.
Think of the UK as a hospital. We have people (immigrants) coming in. At the moment we have too many people coming in when the hospital isn't clean (homeless people, hungry people). We need to sort the UK out before we keep going on about Africa and dealing with immigrants. NONE should be allowed in for 3 years until we've sorted our doorstep out. I understadn it's out tradition and duty to help those in need, but to help them on a the right scale, we need to stop helping them, and prepare.
As for a civil war, I wouldn't be suprised. The political correctness of the world is over-taking the UK like a virus. Most English people are happy to wave the flag and in a lot of cases we're told we can't. It'll get to a point, and it saddens me as it must you, that the people who have been here for generations are sick of the flurry of immigrants taking over and sponging off the company. We SHOULDN'T pay tax so some guy in Luthuania who is sick of the country and feels like living the good life can come into England, get a free house, a car, Sky-TV and the SAME amount of money that an elderly lady gets who's plugged 70-years worth of income tax into the country.
And we WERE stronger when we hung people. Of course, that wasn't all we did and that's not all I said in that sentence. But when we were a nation to be feared and respected, we didn't have this trouble. We had a good army, we didn't back down from fights or pressure from some guy over what's politically correct. We didn't have some over-paid guy from Luxembourg to tell us how to run OUR country and who WE should accept into our borders! France don't accept immigrants, Italy don't, Spain, Germany.. the list goes on.
If someone takes someone elses life intentionally, without good reason, their life, in turn should be taken. If you want our country to keep taking giant leaps to becoming a melting pot of every Tom, Díck and Harry and be all pússywhipped about how to handle bad people, then fine. Go to a different country and do it there. You can live on Goatboy Island where anyone can do what the feck they bloody well fecking like!!! The US still has the death penalty and so do the very high majority of eastern countries - why not here? If people want to live good lives here, work hard and fit into our culture, then fine - but if they come here, kill people and wreak havok, then they should be dealt with.
Britain was strongest when we ruled from the throne, used capital punishment and had more integrity and fight. If someone had killed your girlfriend would you rather the Britain of today lock them up for 25 years to see them get out in 13 for good behaviour? Or would you like to see them hung/killed as you would have in the days of old?
> Goatboy wrote:
>
> I will say that I have a better working knowledge of government and
> their actions around the world than you do.
> There is a world of difference discussing how I percieve the actions
> of our governments, using supporting links to outside websites, and
> coming up with racist bilge like "Britain was at its strongest
> when we hung people, had a great army and ruled from the throne with
> integrity"
Granted, you may know more than me, but you certainly know anything that the government don't want you to. You many well know about the US cutting oil supplies, or Britian doing this or that, but the 100% of stuff you know is probably only around 5% of what actually goes on.
Well that kind of blows your argument out of the water now doesn't
> it?
> "I can't...because I don't know" - so where exactly have
> you got the opinion that I form my ideas from internet blogs and
> friends then?
> Ah yes, "I don't know"
So it's not true? Honestly? Newspapers lie, so do internet sites. You read reports and posts on the internet. The internet is full of ballucks. You don't know for sure that your opinion or what you say is 100% true.
> "Status quo mindset of the younger generation"
> Really? ..... of these forums and others.
I wasn't around when you were talking about the Iraq invasion. Also, what you hear in your A-Level politics is nothing on the scale of things. From your comments, your mindset seems like a modern one, and one which consists neither of individuality or patriotism.
> And why do you feel the country would be in a far worse state?
> It's no good just issuing blanket statements with "I don't
> know" caveats on, you need to explain why you think these
> things. Yes I continually criticise Bush & Blair, because their actions
> and consquences have done, and continue to, harm the planet.
> Should I not speak out when I feel the leaders we elect to fulfill
> our desires act as demagogues? Should I blindly agree to policies
> and actions that I feel are wrong, simply because I am not a member of
> government?
The country would be in a FAR worse state because you don't know anything about running a country. As for your 'harm the Planet' I understand this to be a environmental comment... i'd like to see you balance the economy of a country by getting everyone to walk from Birmingham to London to work. Can't drive a car? Okay, that's all the VAT from selling cars off the next budget. Can't buy petrol? There's another wedge gone. If your planet argument was a political one, then fine. What's the problem? Saddam Hussein is in captivity. He was a tyrant and murderer. Iraq will take time to heal, Rome wasn't built in a day so a country will obviously take years.
> "Me and my opinions of fact when they're supported as well they
> are" Quite apart from the grammatical mangling of that sentence,
> everybody here jumped on you for idiot statements such as, I repeat
> "Britain was at its strongest when we hung people, had a great
> army and ruled from the throne with integrity" and "If
> there isn't a civil war between English people and these Muslims in
> the next 5 years, i'll be quite suprised."
And what?! There was nothing much wrong witht at sentence for a start. Try leaving the commas in, next time. And Britain was stronger back then. We shouldn't have nations scared of us, but definitely fear us (as in repsect). The problem nowadays, is that these Eastern European and Asian immigrants flock in because they think they can just come here and do what they want. Britain shouldn't be a place where they come, get a free house, get hundred of pounds of benefit a month and du feck all. If they want to come here they should work, share houses and there should be a definite limit of say 20,000 a year. They should get enough to eat, sleep be awrm and drink, not have Sky-TV and a car. We have BRITISH people on our own streets who are starving. We should address this first.
Think of the UK as a hospital. We have people (immigrants) coming in. At the moment we have too many people coming in when the hospital isn't clean (homeless people, hungry people). We need to sort the UK out before we keep going on about Africa and dealing with immigrants. NONE should be allowed in for 3 years until we've sorted our doorstep out. I understadn it's out tradition and duty to help those in need, but to help them on a the right scale, we need to stop helping them, and prepare.
As for a civil war, I wouldn't be suprised. The political correctness of the world is over-taking the UK like a virus. Most English people are happy to wave the flag and in a lot of cases we're told we can't. It'll get to a point, and it saddens me as it must you, that the people who have been here for generations are sick of the flurry of immigrants taking over and sponging off the company. We SHOULDN'T pay tax so some guy in Luthuania who is sick of the country and feels like living the good life can come into England, get a free house, a car, Sky-TV and the SAME amount of money that an elderly lady gets who's plugged 70-years worth of income tax into the country.
And we WERE stronger when we hung people. Of course, that wasn't all we did and that's not all I said in that sentence. But when we were a nation to be feared and respected, we didn't have this trouble. We had a good army, we didn't back down from fights or pressure from some guy over what's politically correct. We didn't have some over-paid guy from Luxembourg to tell us how to run OUR country and who WE should accept into our borders! France don't accept immigrants, Italy don't, Spain, Germany.. the list goes on.
If someone takes someone elses life intentionally, without good reason, their life, in turn should be taken. If you want our country to keep taking giant leaps to becoming a melting pot of every Tom, Díck and Harry and be all pússywhipped about how to handle bad people, then fine. Go to a different country and do it there. You can live on Goatboy Island where anyone can do what the feck they bloody well fecking like!!! The US still has the death penalty and so do the very high majority of eastern countries - why not here? If people want to live good lives here, work hard and fit into our culture, then fine - but if they come here, kill people and wreak havok, then they should be dealt with.
Britain was strongest when we ruled from the throne, used capital punishment and had more integrity and fight. If someone had killed your girlfriend would you rather the Britain of today lock them up for 25 years to see them get out in 13 for good behaviour? Or would you like to see them hung/killed as you would have in the days of old?
Page: