Viewing Thread:
"For all you 'Dual wielding su>

Shut your pie-holes. Who cares if there's 2 guns or not - it's not going to make or break the game. It's a new feature, like hijacking vehicles, designed to add a tiny thrill to the gameplay. A tiny thrill, but for f**ks sake the main focus is that there's actually a new game, new challenges, new plot. If you're so bothered that it's the 'same old game', why bother playing any games anymore, there are hardly any new concepts that are so instantly enjoyable. In fact, why even bother getting up in the morning - the sky's still blue, just like yesterday, but it's nice to look at. Unlike your ugly faces.

I'm talking about PS2 shooters though. There are only about 4.

You also said Frontline was really good.

Which plainly isn't true.

Call of Duty: Fienst Hour looks sweet...

ÂLŠ†ÂÎR wrote:
> You also said Frontline was really good.

Yeah, I liked it. I mean, what choice did I have? Didn't have an Xbox at the time, and my PC back then was poorer than a gypsy going to University.

monkey_man wrote:
> a gypsy going to University.

They dont even go to school, let alone uni.

Cyclone wrote:
> Which plainly isn't true.
>
> Call of Duty: Fienst Hour looks sweet...

Apparently the tank handling is dodgy and the levels with tank driving in leave you a distinct sense of not wanting to do them again.

Nevermind

monkey_man wrote:
> Metal Arms: A Glitch in the System did it, and that was an excellent
> game too. You could even use weapons from one hand in conjunction
> with weapons in the other. And you could drive loads of vehicles
> too. In fact, that was one hell of a game!

Agreed, best £20 I ever spent.