Viewing Thread:
"For all you 'Dual wielding su>

Shut your pie-holes. Who cares if there's 2 guns or not - it's not going to make or break the game. It's a new feature, like hijacking vehicles, designed to add a tiny thrill to the gameplay. A tiny thrill, but for f**ks sake the main focus is that there's actually a new game, new challenges, new plot. If you're so bothered that it's the 'same old game', why bother playing any games anymore, there are hardly any new concepts that are so instantly enjoyable. In fact, why even bother getting up in the morning - the sky's still blue, just like yesterday, but it's nice to look at. Unlike your ugly faces.

monkey_man wrote:
> Metal Arms: A Glitch in the System did it, and that was an excellent
> game too. You could even use weapons from one hand in conjunction
> with weapons in the other. And you could drive loads of vehicles
> too. In fact, that was one hell of a game!

Agreed, best £20 I ever spent.

Nevermind

Cyclone wrote:
> Which plainly isn't true.
>
> Call of Duty: Fienst Hour looks sweet...

Apparently the tank handling is dodgy and the levels with tank driving in leave you a distinct sense of not wanting to do them again.

monkey_man wrote:
> a gypsy going to University.

They dont even go to school, let alone uni.

ÂLŠ†ÂÎR wrote:
> You also said Frontline was really good.

Yeah, I liked it. I mean, what choice did I have? Didn't have an Xbox at the time, and my PC back then was poorer than a gypsy going to University.

Which plainly isn't true.

Call of Duty: Fienst Hour looks sweet...

You also said Frontline was really good.

I'm talking about PS2 shooters though. There are only about 4.

Allied Assault is the only decent Medal of Honour since the original. All the others have just been average at best.

Cyclone wrote:
> monkey_man wrote:
> MoH (the good one)
>
> ?

Medal of Hono(u)r: Frontline. It's really good, but Red Faction 2 had vehicles, destructible environments, and really good weapons.