The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Yup.
Page:
Yeah, I think I prefer Johnson.
He can hold onto the ball better than Defoe, and he's got power as well as pace. He's also a very experienced penalty taker.
I thought he had a solid game against the USA and, had he have been partnered with Owen and not Smith, he'd have probably got one or two assists.
I'd feel more comfortable with him as a substitute than Smith, Crouch and Heskey. I'm a bit unsure about Defoe at the moment.
He can hold onto the ball better than Defoe, and he's got power as well as pace. He's also a very experienced penalty taker.
I thought he had a solid game against the USA and, had he have been partnered with Owen and not Smith, he'd have probably got one or two assists.
I'd feel more comfortable with him as a substitute than Smith, Crouch and Heskey. I'm a bit unsure about Defoe at the moment.
Binks wrote:
> Defoe is far much better than Owen any day, so it doesn't count as a
> loss for England to have him playing instead of Owen
No doubts Defoe is good, but I can't believe Owen scores a hat-trick against a half-decent South American side (not exactly San Marino, are they) and people still put him down.
His scoring record for England argues itself.
> Defoe is far much better than Owen any day, so it doesn't count as a
> loss for England to have him playing instead of Owen
No doubts Defoe is good, but I can't believe Owen scores a hat-trick against a half-decent South American side (not exactly San Marino, are they) and people still put him down.
His scoring record for England argues itself.
Lil Bro criticising a Spurs player and not proclaiming him to be better than God? What's going on, have i stepped into another universe?
*head explodes from confusion*
*head explodes from confusion*
It could be Colourless, couldn't it?
Ant wrote:
> No doubts Defoe is good, but I can't believe Owen scores a hat-trick
> against a half-decent South American side (not exactly San Marino,
> are they) and people still put him down.
>
> His scoring record for England argues itself.
Problem is good goal scoreres fall into two categories, the ones who score the important goals and the ones who don't. Owen only seems to score goals when it doesn't matter, i.e. in friendlies and when matches are already won.
> No doubts Defoe is good, but I can't believe Owen scores a hat-trick
> against a half-decent South American side (not exactly San Marino,
> are they) and people still put him down.
>
> His scoring record for England argues itself.
Problem is good goal scoreres fall into two categories, the ones who score the important goals and the ones who don't. Owen only seems to score goals when it doesn't matter, i.e. in friendlies and when matches are already won.
Ashman wrote:
> It could be Colourless, couldn't it?
Aha. But no. Not this time.
> It could be Colourless, couldn't it?
Aha. But no. Not this time.
Cong_Man wrote:
> Owen only seems to
> score goals when it doesn't matter, i.e. in friendlies and when
> matches are already won.
Owens scored many important goals for Real Madrid this season.
> Owen only seems to
> score goals when it doesn't matter, i.e. in friendlies and when
> matches are already won.
Owens scored many important goals for Real Madrid this season.
Was mostly referring to his international career...
Cong_Man wrote:
Owen only seems to score goals when it doesn't matter, i.e. in friendlies and when matches are already won.
---------------
Brazil last World Cup.
Portugal last Euro's.
Other tournament's before that.
Do you expect him to score winning goals in every single match?
Owen only seems to score goals when it doesn't matter, i.e. in friendlies and when matches are already won.
---------------
Brazil last World Cup.
Portugal last Euro's.
Other tournament's before that.
Do you expect him to score winning goals in every single match?
Owen is better than Defoe tbh. Owen and Rooney should be the first choice with Defoe being the 3rd man.
Page: