The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
If you knew you would get away with it as far as with regards to law and you'd only have to live with your conscience, would you…
1) Steal 100 pounds from an old person?
2) Steal 100,000 pounds from a bank?
3) Kill someone for 1,000,000 pounds?
1) Steal 100 pounds from an old person?
2) Steal 100,000 pounds from a bank?
3) Kill someone for 1,000,000 pounds?
Page:
Ineedsleep wrote:
> Who said it would have to be armed robbery? Why not simple fraud?
But that's the inherent fault with these types of questions. The only way you can answer them is if you go into great detail about the effects of what hypothetical choice has on the people affected by it. As mentioned, what if it's an extraordinarily rich old millionare, who's a total ass? It would be a resounding "yes."
Everyone so far is assuming it's the poor old bloke / woman who lives just down the street who's going to freeze to death if you steal it.
I say it's
1) A rich millionare
2) An armed robbery on a bank, traumatising someone to a breakdown.
3) Mahatma Gandhi
And that totally changes all answers.
Sorry. Bored. :D
> Who said it would have to be armed robbery? Why not simple fraud?
But that's the inherent fault with these types of questions. The only way you can answer them is if you go into great detail about the effects of what hypothetical choice has on the people affected by it. As mentioned, what if it's an extraordinarily rich old millionare, who's a total ass? It would be a resounding "yes."
Everyone so far is assuming it's the poor old bloke / woman who lives just down the street who's going to freeze to death if you steal it.
I say it's
1) A rich millionare
2) An armed robbery on a bank, traumatising someone to a breakdown.
3) Mahatma Gandhi
And that totally changes all answers.
Sorry. Bored. :D
Who said it would have to be armed robbery? Why not simple fraud?
English_Bloke wrote:
> 2) Steal 100,000 pounds from a bank?
Armed robbery is not a victimless crime.
> 2) Steal 100,000 pounds from a bank?
Armed robbery is not a victimless crime.
No
With great pleasure
No
With great pleasure
No
No, definitely not.
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Pandaemonium wrote:
> Yes to all. If I was guaranteed to get away with it. but lets face it,
> it's not a real life situation and never will be, so I can say what I
> like.
>
> Mohammed Al Fayed is pretty old. Does he count?
You only want to rob a bank so you can pretend it's Dog Day Afternoon.
> Yes to all. If I was guaranteed to get away with it. but lets face it,
> it's not a real life situation and never will be, so I can say what I
> like.
>
> Mohammed Al Fayed is pretty old. Does he count?
You only want to rob a bank so you can pretend it's Dog Day Afternoon.
Yes to all. If I was guaranteed to get away with it. but lets face it, it's not a real life situation and never will be, so I can say what I like.
Mohammed Al Fayed is pretty old. Does he count?
Mohammed Al Fayed is pretty old. Does he count?
2) Steal 100,000 pounds from a bank?
ten times
ten times
mikelar wrote:
> I like the way people are really against 1, yet would do easily do 2
> even though it's inevitable that more than £100 of that
> £100,000 would belong to some old basser.
>
> Ignorance is bliss I guess.
Its alot less personal if you don't know who's money is.
> I like the way people are really against 1, yet would do easily do 2
> even though it's inevitable that more than £100 of that
> £100,000 would belong to some old basser.
>
> Ignorance is bliss I guess.
Its alot less personal if you don't know who's money is.
No, yes, probably.
Page: