The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
If you knew you would get away with it as far as with regards to law and you'd only have to live with your conscience, would you…
1) Steal 100 pounds from an old person?
2) Steal 100,000 pounds from a bank?
3) Kill someone for 1,000,000 pounds?
1) Steal 100 pounds from an old person?
2) Steal 100,000 pounds from a bank?
3) Kill someone for 1,000,000 pounds?
Page:
English_Bloke wrote:
> 1) Steal 100 pounds from an old person? - Nope
> 2) Steal 100,000 pounds from a bank? - Without a 2nd thought
> 3) Kill someone for 1,000,000 pounds? - Depends who and why
> 1) Steal 100 pounds from an old person? - Nope
> 2) Steal 100,000 pounds from a bank? - Without a 2nd thought
> 3) Kill someone for 1,000,000 pounds? - Depends who and why
He asked me this in the car the other night. I said I wouldn't do any of them.
> 1) Steal 100 pounds from an old person?
Only if they were rich
> 2) Steal 100,000 pounds from a bank?
Yep no problem with that
> 3) Kill someone for 1,000,000 pounds?
Yeah if i could choose who, otherwise i'd have to think about it
Only if they were rich
> 2) Steal 100,000 pounds from a bank?
Yep no problem with that
> 3) Kill someone for 1,000,000 pounds?
Yeah if i could choose who, otherwise i'd have to think about it
-not for a hundred, pointless
-no too much effort required
-yeah sure sounds like fun
-no too much effort required
-yeah sure sounds like fun
Pandaemonium wrote:
> See, told ya. :P
I know. I am so fickle!
> See, told ya. :P
I know. I am so fickle!
Ooh goody!
But then I wouldn't have to rob, maim or kill anyone to get rich. Just do a "back to the future trick" and I'd be super rich.
But then I wouldn't have to rob, maim or kill anyone to get rich. Just do a "back to the future trick" and I'd be super rich.
Ineedsleep wrote:
> That's true enough. I'd change my answers to yes, yes and eh? I
> thought Mahatma Gandhi was dead :D
I'll provide you with a time machine since we're flying high through the realms of fantasy. :D
> That's true enough. I'd change my answers to yes, yes and eh? I
> thought Mahatma Gandhi was dead :D
I'll provide you with a time machine since we're flying high through the realms of fantasy. :D
Pandaemonium wrote:
> Everyone so far is assuming it's the poor old bloke / woman who lives
> just down the street who's going to freeze to death if you steal it.
>
> I say it's
>
> 1) A rich millionare
> 2) An armed robbery on a bank, traumatising someone to a breakdown.
> 3) Mahatma Gandhi
>
> And that totally changes all answers.
That's true enough. I'd change my answers to yes, yes and eh? I thought Mahatma Gandhi was dead :D
> Sorry. Bored. :D
I'm sorry you're bored as well :D
> Everyone so far is assuming it's the poor old bloke / woman who lives
> just down the street who's going to freeze to death if you steal it.
>
> I say it's
>
> 1) A rich millionare
> 2) An armed robbery on a bank, traumatising someone to a breakdown.
> 3) Mahatma Gandhi
>
> And that totally changes all answers.
That's true enough. I'd change my answers to yes, yes and eh? I thought Mahatma Gandhi was dead :D
> Sorry. Bored. :D
I'm sorry you're bored as well :D
Super Kev wrote:
> yes
> yes
> yes
While he previously said :-
Super Kev wrote:
> 1-no way
> 2-yes way
> 3-maybe
See, told ya. :P
> yes
> yes
> yes
While he previously said :-
Super Kev wrote:
> 1-no way
> 2-yes way
> 3-maybe
See, told ya. :P
Pandaemonium wrote:
> I say it's
>
> 1) A rich millionare
> 2) An armed robbery on a bank, traumatising someone to a breakdown.
> 3) Mahatma Gandhi
>
> And that totally changes all answers.
>
> Sorry. Bored. :D
yes
yes
yes
> I say it's
>
> 1) A rich millionare
> 2) An armed robbery on a bank, traumatising someone to a breakdown.
> 3) Mahatma Gandhi
>
> And that totally changes all answers.
>
> Sorry. Bored. :D
yes
yes
yes
Page: