The "Nintendo Games" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
I'm suprised they haven't renamed her to SHARAAAAAAAN Dark.
You guys should be glad Nintendo sold Rare....
> Tphi wrote:
> There's nothing
> there the Xbox couldn't handle with ease.
>
> I wouldn't say that.
No you misunderstand me, I was refering only to the Perfect Dark stuff with my comment which I think we both agree on - the Xbox could handle the current build of the game.
And yeh, it's only a first-gen Xbox title but come on, how long has it been in development now? Even by Rare's standards it's a good long while :D
> Joe Dark?
Three letters: pun.
Edit: Either that or Tilta can't spell.
> There's nothing
> there the Xbox couldn't handle with ease.
I wouldn't say that.
There's some pretty damn spanky looking footage of some shooty games on IGN. Also the survival horror game being made by Sega looks damn beautiful.
Perfect Dark looks awful though. The only thing that excites me about it is the possibility of 50 players online.
Am I being completely retarded now?
Don't answer that
> Or IE
Worked fine for me in IE...
*Clears cache* It seems to have been mysteriously removed now (fast work, Microsoft Lawyers?)
[URL]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v688/tphi/media.jpg[/URL] It's on my photobucket now anyways.