The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Don't get me wrong, I love eating meat and I'm not going to stop.
But I might start avoiding KFC a little more.
[URL]http://www.peta.org/[/URL] Check out Pammie's video. It's explicit, and there were quite a few scenes that really sickened and shocked me.
I like PETA's methods, but I still don't think about becoming a vegetarian. Animal cruelty, however, is a different subject.
But I might start avoiding KFC a little more.
[URL]http://www.peta.org/[/URL] Check out Pammie's video. It's explicit, and there were quite a few scenes that really sickened and shocked me.
I like PETA's methods, but I still don't think about becoming a vegetarian. Animal cruelty, however, is a different subject.
Page:
Celestine wrote:
> lcarus wrote:
> Yeah, I've been a real bad online schoolboy. So cane me, Miss Rule
> By
> Divine Right.
>
> Aren't you something. While I was in the thick of it defending my
> position in the Light affair, you were right there..albeit meek, yet
> still CATHOLIC none the less. Don't try to flip the script here
> Icarus. You're one-up methods are unbecoming.
Um, what the hell? I wasn't even reading your plea or whatever it was for Catholicism. One-up methods... oh dear dear me... looks like you've pis sed in your cornflakes here, hun.
>
>
> It does? Like with Grix, I'm surprised with your extreme lack of
> judgement. Though it is acceptable for yourself, I and anyone with
> the right sense of judgement would easily dismiss the posting spree
> as a minor thing compared to the other posts I've made in the past.
> Go on... ask the peers.
>
> What are you talking about again? I don't have to ask anyone for
> anything here. Not even Grix. I'm on my own merit. And, that
> yellow tag is enough proof for me against your judgement. You've
> been warned for a reason, and I for one would really like to know
> why??
It's obvious, dear. I thinkn everyone who gives a damn already knows. use your well brought up head to work it out.
then try to justify it by
> pilfering on a Notable's celebrity by trailing quotes through their
> threads pestering and repeating crap that really no one gives an iota
> about. Hmmm...that sounds like trolling to me.
Personally, I don't know much about that. However, if you mean repeating crap that is trying to explain to said Notable (go rank!! - again) the meaning, because he doesn't immediately understand the points, then I can relate to that.
>
> Integrity? If it was decided by creating massive posts on a forum
> then by all means, slay me. But I find it rather pathetic that you
> can even question a person's integrity or character whom you know
> nothing about other than reading a few posts that disagreed with
> your
> buddy. Values in religion, eh.
>
> I'll defend him before you. I'd defend you, if you were right, too.
> But you're not. You're wrong, Icarus.
Remind me, wrong in what exactly? You seem to be using the century old tactic of not replying to a point. In an offline world, I'd stand by a close friend than a stranger anyday. But here on a discussion forum (before your premature and unnecessary insulting), where we listen to each others stuff, think about it, argue/reply /agree/whatever, you just seem to focus on one thing that so happens to be the only negative thing a member of said community has done, and instantly dismiss EVERYTHING else posted by them.
Even if it wasn't mentioned in any religious text, I would have thought the statement "avoid jumping to conclusions" was a worldwide ethic. Especially among civilised, well brought up peeps. But I guess there are two sides to every new, shiny coin.
> I've not changed my position on this topic. Any other topic that
> I've engaged in I have answered to the best of my ability and
> conceded where the inquirer was being nothing more than a sheer ass.
No, I was making points that went ignored in place of the shameless downgrading of a member.
> lcarus wrote:
> Yeah, I've been a real bad online schoolboy. So cane me, Miss Rule
> By
> Divine Right.
>
> Aren't you something. While I was in the thick of it defending my
> position in the Light affair, you were right there..albeit meek, yet
> still CATHOLIC none the less. Don't try to flip the script here
> Icarus. You're one-up methods are unbecoming.
Um, what the hell? I wasn't even reading your plea or whatever it was for Catholicism. One-up methods... oh dear dear me... looks like you've pis sed in your cornflakes here, hun.
>
>
> It does? Like with Grix, I'm surprised with your extreme lack of
> judgement. Though it is acceptable for yourself, I and anyone with
> the right sense of judgement would easily dismiss the posting spree
> as a minor thing compared to the other posts I've made in the past.
> Go on... ask the peers.
>
> What are you talking about again? I don't have to ask anyone for
> anything here. Not even Grix. I'm on my own merit. And, that
> yellow tag is enough proof for me against your judgement. You've
> been warned for a reason, and I for one would really like to know
> why??
It's obvious, dear. I thinkn everyone who gives a damn already knows. use your well brought up head to work it out.
then try to justify it by
> pilfering on a Notable's celebrity by trailing quotes through their
> threads pestering and repeating crap that really no one gives an iota
> about. Hmmm...that sounds like trolling to me.
Personally, I don't know much about that. However, if you mean repeating crap that is trying to explain to said Notable (go rank!! - again) the meaning, because he doesn't immediately understand the points, then I can relate to that.
>
> Integrity? If it was decided by creating massive posts on a forum
> then by all means, slay me. But I find it rather pathetic that you
> can even question a person's integrity or character whom you know
> nothing about other than reading a few posts that disagreed with
> your
> buddy. Values in religion, eh.
>
> I'll defend him before you. I'd defend you, if you were right, too.
> But you're not. You're wrong, Icarus.
Remind me, wrong in what exactly? You seem to be using the century old tactic of not replying to a point. In an offline world, I'd stand by a close friend than a stranger anyday. But here on a discussion forum (before your premature and unnecessary insulting), where we listen to each others stuff, think about it, argue/reply /agree/whatever, you just seem to focus on one thing that so happens to be the only negative thing a member of said community has done, and instantly dismiss EVERYTHING else posted by them.
Even if it wasn't mentioned in any religious text, I would have thought the statement "avoid jumping to conclusions" was a worldwide ethic. Especially among civilised, well brought up peeps. But I guess there are two sides to every new, shiny coin.
> I've not changed my position on this topic. Any other topic that
> I've engaged in I have answered to the best of my ability and
> conceded where the inquirer was being nothing more than a sheer ass.
No, I was making points that went ignored in place of the shameless downgrading of a member.
lcarus wrote:
> Yeah, I've been a real bad online schoolboy. So cane me, Miss Rule By
> Divine Right.
Aren't you something. While I was in the thick of it defending my position in the Light affair, you were right there..albeit meek, yet still CATHOLIC none the less. Don't try to flip the script here Icarus. You're one-up methods are unbecoming.
> We're all on our merit here..or so I'd
> like to believe. The fact that you could try to con the system by
> posting so much nonsense to up your word count and now the fact that
> you have a yellow tag, speaks volumes of your integrity. I'm going
> on fact, as a member of your peers.
>
> It does? Like with Grix, I'm surprised with your extreme lack of
> judgement. Though it is acceptable for yourself, I and anyone with
> the right sense of judgement would easily dismiss the posting spree
> as a minor thing compared to the other posts I've made in the past.
> Go on... ask the peers.
What are you talking about again? I don't have to ask anyone for anything here. Not even Grix. I'm on my own merit. And, that yellow tag is enough proof for me against your judgement. You've been warned for a reason, and I for one would really like to know why??
It's not so much the posting spree, because I'll admit to posting lyrics for shiats and giggles. Some people post nonsense and a great deal of it. Some people post forum rules over and over and OVER AND OVER to get their word count up and then try to justify it by pilfering on a Notable's celebrity by trailing quotes through their threads pestering and repeating crap that really no one gives an iota about. Hmmm...that sounds like trolling to me.
> Integrity? If it was decided by creating massive posts on a forum
> then by all means, slay me. But I find it rather pathetic that you
> can even question a person's integrity or character whom you know
> nothing about other than reading a few posts that disagreed with your
> buddy. Values in religion, eh.
>
I'll defend him before you. I'd defend you, if you were right, too. But you're not. You're wrong, Icarus.
> Also, why so quick to change the subject when some points still
> haven't been answered to yet?
I've not changed my position on this topic. Any other topic that I've engaged in I have answered to the best of my ability and conceded where the inquirer was being nothing more than a sheer ass.
I'll give you that much credibility here, too.
> Yeah, I've been a real bad online schoolboy. So cane me, Miss Rule By
> Divine Right.
Aren't you something. While I was in the thick of it defending my position in the Light affair, you were right there..albeit meek, yet still CATHOLIC none the less. Don't try to flip the script here Icarus. You're one-up methods are unbecoming.
> We're all on our merit here..or so I'd
> like to believe. The fact that you could try to con the system by
> posting so much nonsense to up your word count and now the fact that
> you have a yellow tag, speaks volumes of your integrity. I'm going
> on fact, as a member of your peers.
>
> It does? Like with Grix, I'm surprised with your extreme lack of
> judgement. Though it is acceptable for yourself, I and anyone with
> the right sense of judgement would easily dismiss the posting spree
> as a minor thing compared to the other posts I've made in the past.
> Go on... ask the peers.
What are you talking about again? I don't have to ask anyone for anything here. Not even Grix. I'm on my own merit. And, that yellow tag is enough proof for me against your judgement. You've been warned for a reason, and I for one would really like to know why??
It's not so much the posting spree, because I'll admit to posting lyrics for shiats and giggles. Some people post nonsense and a great deal of it. Some people post forum rules over and over and OVER AND OVER to get their word count up and then try to justify it by pilfering on a Notable's celebrity by trailing quotes through their threads pestering and repeating crap that really no one gives an iota about. Hmmm...that sounds like trolling to me.
> Integrity? If it was decided by creating massive posts on a forum
> then by all means, slay me. But I find it rather pathetic that you
> can even question a person's integrity or character whom you know
> nothing about other than reading a few posts that disagreed with your
> buddy. Values in religion, eh.
>
I'll defend him before you. I'd defend you, if you were right, too. But you're not. You're wrong, Icarus.
> Also, why so quick to change the subject when some points still
> haven't been answered to yet?
I've not changed my position on this topic. Any other topic that I've engaged in I have answered to the best of my ability and conceded where the inquirer was being nothing more than a sheer ass.
I'll give you that much credibility here, too.
Grix Thraves wrote:
> It's not what you did, it's why you did it.
>
Yeah, I was bored. What can I say? Fills the time. Some talk to themselves, some do mass, I happen to make massive posts. Wanna tell me how to run my life too?
> It's not what you did, it's why you did it.
>
Yeah, I was bored. What can I say? Fills the time. Some talk to themselves, some do mass, I happen to make massive posts. Wanna tell me how to run my life too?
Celestine wrote:
> lcarus wrote:
> Celestine wrote:
> Oooh...looky thar..a yellow tag on yer's. Now that goes to say
> something?
>
> "And with nothing constructive to say... insult by rank."
>
>
> I've got this solidly engrained perspective of you Icarus and it's
> not an admirable one, I can assure you. Especially with you carrying
> on as you have this past week.
Yeah, I've been a real bad online schoolboy. So cane me, Miss Rule By Divine Right.
We're all on our merit here..or so I'd
> like to believe. The fact that you could try to con the system by
> posting so much nonsense to up your word count and now the fact that
> you have a yellow tag, speaks volumes of your integrity. I'm going
> on fact, as a member of your peers.
It does? Like with Grix, I'm surprised with your extreme lack of judgement. Though it is acceptable for yourself, I and anyone with the right sense of judgement would easily dismiss the posting spree as a minor thing compared to the other posts I've made in the past. Go on... ask the peers.
Integrity? If it was decided by creating massive posts on a forum then by all means, slay me. But I find it rather pathetic that you can even question a person's integrity or character whom you know nothing about other than reading a few posts that disagreed with your buddy. Values in religion, eh.
Also, why so quick to change the subject when some points still haven't been answered to yet?
> lcarus wrote:
> Celestine wrote:
> Oooh...looky thar..a yellow tag on yer's. Now that goes to say
> something?
>
> "And with nothing constructive to say... insult by rank."
>
>
> I've got this solidly engrained perspective of you Icarus and it's
> not an admirable one, I can assure you. Especially with you carrying
> on as you have this past week.
Yeah, I've been a real bad online schoolboy. So cane me, Miss Rule By Divine Right.
We're all on our merit here..or so I'd
> like to believe. The fact that you could try to con the system by
> posting so much nonsense to up your word count and now the fact that
> you have a yellow tag, speaks volumes of your integrity. I'm going
> on fact, as a member of your peers.
It does? Like with Grix, I'm surprised with your extreme lack of judgement. Though it is acceptable for yourself, I and anyone with the right sense of judgement would easily dismiss the posting spree as a minor thing compared to the other posts I've made in the past. Go on... ask the peers.
Integrity? If it was decided by creating massive posts on a forum then by all means, slay me. But I find it rather pathetic that you can even question a person's integrity or character whom you know nothing about other than reading a few posts that disagreed with your buddy. Values in religion, eh.
Also, why so quick to change the subject when some points still haven't been answered to yet?
I wanna know more about the yellow tag..
Isn't it brilli... Oh no wait. You were being sarcastic. Yeah.
Bad Icarus. Tut.
Bad Icarus. Tut.
Yeah, I love to go copy and paste forum rules over and over in secret when I'm bored too, really gets me going.
Or maybe he was just bored?
lcarus wrote:
> Err... it is. But really, what damage was done? I made several massive
> posts on a forum that's hardly read by anyone. So what?
It's not what you did, it's why you did it.
You continuing to say 'it's just a forum' when obviously you had intention of increasing your post count through feign means? Is it really that important?
> Err... it is. But really, what damage was done? I made several massive
> posts on a forum that's hardly read by anyone. So what?
It's not what you did, it's why you did it.
You continuing to say 'it's just a forum' when obviously you had intention of increasing your post count through feign means? Is it really that important?
to be honest I'm not that worried about how people kill chickens. They're only chickens. They smell disgusting and look horrible.
Page: