Viewing Thread:
"San Andreas Sucks: It's official"

I've read many negative reviews so far and after playing the game myself I fully agree that this game is disapointing. It truly is a shame to see such a waste of potential in what could of been the best game of 2004, quite easily.

Just one of the reviews that shares my opinion can be read at this location:
http://www.somethingawful.com/articles.php?a=2478

;-)

I think GTA San Andreas is the best game out there at the moment, heck it aint perfect but no game is. And u people complaining about the bugs well what do expect its a massive massive game and had to be put on a dual layer disk cause its so big so what do you expect. If you think GTA suks ur just terminaly ill and probaly enjoy playing games like scrabble party and those other boring games!

I agree with the original statement. This game contains too many bugs. The designers seem to have given us better missions and no loading screens, but taken away graphics, graphic stability, robberies (I seem to remember being able to rob stores in vice city, why not in this game?!) and random acts of deletion (cars in garages, all weapons at various plot points).

Maybe the PC version will be up to scratch… this one certainly isn’t.

Woodywoods wrote:
> if any ov u think gta san andreas sucks u i wanna no wot types ov
> games u like.

I was obviously joking when I said that this game sucks.
But those jerks at somethingawful are serious when they say they dislike the game.

Hell, you should drop them an email and put them right, on behalf of all the hardcore SA fans.

:)

if any ov u think gta san andreas sucks u i wanna no wot types ov games u like.

:D

ßulle†† wrote:
> 'THE MADMAN'<------------------------------------------->The
> point
>
>
> You were way off

yeh i thought i was abit behind the times.

'THE MADMAN'<------------------------------------------->The point


You were way off

Jive wrote:
> Funnily enough, the only times the game loads is when you go into a
> building like everyone knew before hand ... 6 - 10 seconds tops for
> waiting ... not exactly a lifetime is it?

yes lets all play San andreas for 10 seconds at a time, i think ill pop in 50 buildings whilst completing it and it will take 8 minutes 20 seconds to complete.

its not the last one, its the last one to Ps2

P.s. there is no need to suck up to a website you know, they don't control your life.

The Untimate B.O.W wrote:
> Gezz, what is worng with pepole today?
> They say good games is bad, and bad games is good eh?
> Well they are truly worng!!!
> Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas is the best game of 2004.
> END OF STORY!!!

Deary me. For the PS2 most definately. But with Halo 2 and Half life 2?

hohohoho.

ßulle†† wrote:
> ßulle†† wrote:
> Some people still don't get it...
>
> *shakes head*

lol, i got it after you lot said it the first time, but these people still dont get it after you have said what it really is about 10 times.