Viewing Thread:
"Let's sod all this democracy rubbish and give communism a try."

Hey, at least things will get done. It makes me sick listening to the false promises and pathetic squabbling by the opposing candidates.

I shan't be wasting any of my time voting this year, much like last general election.

And these patronising conservative billboards with handwritten 'make sense' slogans just serve to illustrate how fickle our leaders are.

Now, if a party pledged to give me back the 15 grand I forked out for my sub-standard higher education, I might be tempted to draw an 'X' in their box.

FinalFantasyFanatic wrote:

> In conclusion: Borat sucks man willy.

Really, I was agreeing with you. It's gerrid who has his jam jar-esque geek specs on, with his 'I say tomato, you say tom-eh-to' rubbish.

What this country needs is another war, beginning with an air-strike on ville-de-gerrid.

really.

8>)

game over? sagdiev

gerrid wrote:
> FinalFantasyFanatic wrote:
> I wouldn't say the sentance structure ties one to a direct opposite.
>
> I'd say it clearly implies that they are opposing processes and that
> you either have one or the other.

I wouldn't say it implies a direct opposite between the first and second things - although, yes, it does imply that you either have one or the other.

And in the case, you can have both at the same time to some degree.

In conclusion: Borat sucks man willy.

Regards,

gerrid 5 - 0 world

gerrid said :
> I'd say it clearly implies that they are opposing processes and that
> you either have one or the other.

That's it, get out of my thread.

Ah, I see.
The structure does indeed imply that the second suggestion would be somewhat removed from the first, which isn't clearly the case here.

[to mem]

FinalFantasyFanatic wrote:
> I wouldn't say the sentance structure ties one to a direct opposite.

I'd say it clearly implies that they are opposing processes and that you either have one or the other.

And what FFF said dictates my opinion.

> I wouldn't say the sentance structure ties one to a direct opposite.

"Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely"
Lord Acton

Paradox: wrote:
> and dignity?

And privacy, and money, and freedom of speech, and any sort of life. And your foreskin.
Nah, we'll let you keep that.