The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
[URL]http://www.veritasparty.co.uk/[/URL]
Well I thought i'd at least check out his 101 lies section, interesting.
Well I thought i'd at least check out his 101 lies section, interesting.
Page:
Remember though Jim; kevstar answers his own questions. It's the only way he can actually get the answer he wants...
Light wrote:
> Remember though Jim; kevstar answers his own questions. It's the only
> way he can actually get the answer he wants...
I keep on forgetting these 'special facts' about kevstar - I'll make an effort to work around them in future
> Remember though Jim; kevstar answers his own questions. It's the only
> way he can actually get the answer he wants...
I keep on forgetting these 'special facts' about kevstar - I'll make an effort to work around them in future
Jim of Honor wrote:
> kevstar wrote:
> So what! Your the one who was using it as a tool for the last month
> to
> proove you're idiotic points. I dismissed the claim saying the
> figures were dodgy, and guess what? They were dodgy. So I guess that
> makes me right again, and you wrong again, as always.
>
> Yeah, when did you prove those figures were dodgy? WIth that one
> possibly-biased paper? Not exactly proof to say the figures are
> fiddled with, really, is it? Poor soul.
Err, it's in the link, the 101 questions, theres a few in there on immigration, they fiddled the figures because the home office missed information out as it explains in the link. So yes, this is proof.
> kevstar wrote:
> So what! Your the one who was using it as a tool for the last month
> to
> proove you're idiotic points. I dismissed the claim saying the
> figures were dodgy, and guess what? They were dodgy. So I guess that
> makes me right again, and you wrong again, as always.
>
> Yeah, when did you prove those figures were dodgy? WIth that one
> possibly-biased paper? Not exactly proof to say the figures are
> fiddled with, really, is it? Poor soul.
Err, it's in the link, the 101 questions, theres a few in there on immigration, they fiddled the figures because the home office missed information out as it explains in the link. So yes, this is proof.
~pats kevstar on the head~
Of course it's proof Kevin, of course it is; heaven forbid that a racist should ever be wrong about immigration. Especially one who said Arab culture has never given anything of value to the world.
~checks pockets~
Does anyone have a biscuit for kevstar? I seem to have ran out.
Of course it's proof Kevin, of course it is; heaven forbid that a racist should ever be wrong about immigration. Especially one who said Arab culture has never given anything of value to the world.
~checks pockets~
Does anyone have a biscuit for kevstar? I seem to have ran out.
I thought we are in the intelligent discussions forum; this bickering is childish, and has gone slightly off topic from the Veritas party. Why can't you accept the others views? We should be glad we live in a democracy that allows such a variety of opinions.
Light wrote:
> ~pats kevstar on the head~
>
> Of course it's proof Kevin, of course it is; heaven forbid that a
> racist should ever be wrong about immigration. Especially one who
> said Arab culture has never given anything of value to the world.
>
>
> ~checks pockets~
>
> Does anyone have a biscuit for kevstar? I seem to have ran out.
Good Lord, here we go. You are aware that it wasn't even him who said this don't you. If you look in the link it tells you where the sources from you idiot, something which you obviously havn't done.
> ~pats kevstar on the head~
>
> Of course it's proof Kevin, of course it is; heaven forbid that a
> racist should ever be wrong about immigration. Especially one who
> said Arab culture has never given anything of value to the world.
>
>
> ~checks pockets~
>
> Does anyone have a biscuit for kevstar? I seem to have ran out.
Good Lord, here we go. You are aware that it wasn't even him who said this don't you. If you look in the link it tells you where the sources from you idiot, something which you obviously havn't done.
nova prospekt wrote:
> I thought we are in the intelligent discussions forum; this bickering
> is childish, and has gone slightly off topic from the Veritas party.
> Why can't you accept the others views? We should be glad we live in a
> democracy that allows such a variety of opinions.
I completely agree. Such a shame that a certain racist is incapable of understanding that, just cos he thinks it, doesn't make it true.
And besides, I like bickering. What exactly have you offered to the debate thus far? I've spent a month arguing patiently with a man who ties his shoelaces with his mouth hanging open. What have you done?
> I thought we are in the intelligent discussions forum; this bickering
> is childish, and has gone slightly off topic from the Veritas party.
> Why can't you accept the others views? We should be glad we live in a
> democracy that allows such a variety of opinions.
I completely agree. Such a shame that a certain racist is incapable of understanding that, just cos he thinks it, doesn't make it true.
And besides, I like bickering. What exactly have you offered to the debate thus far? I've spent a month arguing patiently with a man who ties his shoelaces with his mouth hanging open. What have you done?
kevstar wrote:
> Good Lord, here we go. You are aware that it wasn't even him who said
> this don't you. If you look in the link it tells you where the
> sources from you idiot, something which you obviously havn't done.
~smacks head~
Of course; I should have simply listened to Kilroy, and no-one else. I definitely shouldn't have read the article, published on two separate occasions by the Daily Express, where he accuses all Arabs of being Limb Amputators who offer nothing to society.
Oh, no; hang on a minute...
> Good Lord, here we go. You are aware that it wasn't even him who said
> this don't you. If you look in the link it tells you where the
> sources from you idiot, something which you obviously havn't done.
~smacks head~
Of course; I should have simply listened to Kilroy, and no-one else. I definitely shouldn't have read the article, published on two separate occasions by the Daily Express, where he accuses all Arabs of being Limb Amputators who offer nothing to society.
Oh, no; hang on a minute...
If you like bickering, then perhaps you can explain why you thought it was Kilroy Silk who come up with thoose figures?
kevstar wrote:
> If you like bickering, then perhaps you can explain why you thought it
> was Kilroy Silk who come up with thoose figures?
Who's talking about the figures? And when did I say he came up with them. Looks to me like I was talking about his article in the Express. You know; the one you're now backtracking (again) from having to acknowledge?
> If you like bickering, then perhaps you can explain why you thought it
> was Kilroy Silk who come up with thoose figures?
Who's talking about the figures? And when did I say he came up with them. Looks to me like I was talking about his article in the Express. You know; the one you're now backtracking (again) from having to acknowledge?
Page: