Viewing Thread:
"English_Bloke, Puddin', Flock, Ms NY"

Get.
A.
Goddamn.
Room.

I don't appreciate coming on here to view your sexual innuendo filled posts and pathetic flirting attempts. We all know EB is a toyboy, Puddin' is a slapper, Flock's Professor Snape + a paedo and Ms NY is, well I dunno. Make something up yourselves.

You can rent them by the hour now, y'know.

Puddin' wrote:
> But, if we had made our own topic you still would have been pee'd off
> and still post a topic like this. We can't win.

I wouldn't have said anything. I would probably have laughed.
Please bear in mind I'm not the person who started this topic.

Grix Thraves wrote:
> Paradox: wrote:
> "Did you know Pat Sharp, the bloke who presented Fun House, was
> arrested and charged for paedophillia after he was caught in bed with
> a young boy?"
>
> Oi, no bad mouthing Pat Sharp. Unless er, it's actually true.

Wasn't he on the last series of "The Games"?
When the presenter said that Pat had the buttocks of a 12-year-old boy I thought he was saying he'd got back into shape, I didn't realise he was accusing him of something.

You're sooooo great Flock

:)

Hedfix wrote:
> Yeah like that's going to happen.
>
> I mean ffs be realistic.

if it's not worthy of a topic why have it?

Puddin' wrote:
> Memorandum! wrote:
> OR, if this crap, predictable, dull innuendo is really necessary,
> why
> don't they make their own topic to do it in?
>
> But, if we had made our own topic you still would have been pee'd off
> and still post a topic like this. We can't win.

If Memo dislikes you so much he can use the ignore button, Otherwise I wouldn't bother giving it another moments thought. Get on with your day.

Celestine wrote:
> Cong_Man wrote:
> I like Flock, I think he does his flirting with a subtle sarcasm
> which often goes unnoticed and never fails to make me laugh.
>
> Indeed, I resist the urge to smack 'em one sometimes. He's got a
> cute flair. :P

I'm not sure whether to take the above comments seriously, i tend to take compliments as sarcasm.

Whose watched Scarface before? I'm watching it now, I don't like watching old films but this is great!

Flock wrote:
> Memorandum! wrote:
> Yeah, but people see a topic, want to pass comment on it, then find
> the thread is full of nonsense completely irrelevant to the title.
> If they try to say something remotely relevant to what the topic is
> actually supposed to be about their post just gets lost in a
> sea of unfunny drivel.
>
> So the problem is hijacking threads, hmmm?
> Wasn't it way past midnight, my timing is a little out?
> All topics get hijacked at some point, usually by you or a couple of
> others and if it's a good topic it will continue after it's been
> hijacked.

Both of you do know this discussion is pointless? SURE you could get it sorted out but then you'd have to explain it to all the nOObs who came in and mucked up your threads, plus you know some if us would just do it on purpose.

Leave it, it's not worth it.

AbsoluT Neó wrote:
> Why don't we all just have an orgy and put an end to all this sexual
> tension in here?

Ok.

I want gerrid.

Memorandum! wrote:
> OR, if this crap, predictable, dull innuendo is really necessary, why
> don't they make their own topic to do it in?

But, if we had made our own topic you still would have been pee'd off and still post a topic like this. We can't win.