The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Get.
A.
Goddamn.
Room.
I don't appreciate coming on here to view your sexual innuendo filled posts and pathetic flirting attempts. We all know EB is a toyboy, Puddin' is a slapper, Flock's Professor Snape + a paedo and Ms NY is, well I dunno. Make something up yourselves.
You can rent them by the hour now, y'know.
A.
Goddamn.
Room.
I don't appreciate coming on here to view your sexual innuendo filled posts and pathetic flirting attempts. We all know EB is a toyboy, Puddin' is a slapper, Flock's Professor Snape + a paedo and Ms NY is, well I dunno. Make something up yourselves.
You can rent them by the hour now, y'know.
Page:
Hedfix wrote:
> We're not all robots, we can do what the hell we like with topics
> if we want. Label them how we want, give mis-leading titles, say the
> queen's a man etc...
>
> Anything the staffies don't find inappropriate is acceptable.
>
> If you don't like that go find some new forums because it's not going
> to change.
>
> Capiche?
oh god, he brought out the bold text, run for your lives!
> We're not all robots, we can do what the hell we like with topics
> if we want. Label them how we want, give mis-leading titles, say the
> queen's a man etc...
>
> Anything the staffies don't find inappropriate is acceptable.
>
> If you don't like that go find some new forums because it's not going
> to change.
>
> Capiche?
oh god, he brought out the bold text, run for your lives!
Right. Enough.
This is turning into a prime example of what is wrong with this forum at the moment. Everyone is so concerned with over-analysing everyone elses posts for spelling, deviation from topic etc that they're losing sight of the fact that this forum is a general forum. It's here to make us laugh, let off steam, whatever we need to use it for.
Please, all of you, just get on with your own posts instead of nit-picking everyone elses.
This is turning into a prime example of what is wrong with this forum at the moment. Everyone is so concerned with over-analysing everyone elses posts for spelling, deviation from topic etc that they're losing sight of the fact that this forum is a general forum. It's here to make us laugh, let off steam, whatever we need to use it for.
Please, all of you, just get on with your own posts instead of nit-picking everyone elses.
Hedfix wrote:
> Arguing about threads being hi-jacked is pointless.
>
> It'll happen regardless.
Okay. Doesn't mean I like it though.
Sexual innuendo is so 1998.
> Arguing about threads being hi-jacked is pointless.
>
> It'll happen regardless.
Okay. Doesn't mean I like it though.
Sexual innuendo is so 1998.
We're not all robots, we can do what the hell we like with topics if we want. Label them how we want, give mis-leading titles, say the queen's a man etc...
Anything the staffies don't find inappropriate is acceptable.
If you don't like that go find some new forums because it's not going to change.
Capiche?
Anything the staffies don't find inappropriate is acceptable.
If you don't like that go find some new forums because it's not going to change.
Capiche?
Memorandum! wrote:
> Topics go on for days on forums.
> Is there some rule that says "between 12am and 6am you may
> ignore the topic at hand"?
If no-one else is around and it's not getting in anyones way whats the problem.
> Yes, it is almost inevitable that threads will get highjacked, but
> not within about 20 minutes of their creation... Every time you
> hijack a thread it ends up exactly the same - crap innuendo and sad
> online flirting.
Like i said some people enjoyed it and some didn't but they were hardly great earth shattering topics, if they were we would have been swamped and it would have been impossible.
> Topics go on for days on forums.
> Is there some rule that says "between 12am and 6am you may
> ignore the topic at hand"?
If no-one else is around and it's not getting in anyones way whats the problem.
> Yes, it is almost inevitable that threads will get highjacked, but
> not within about 20 minutes of their creation... Every time you
> hijack a thread it ends up exactly the same - crap innuendo and sad
> online flirting.
Like i said some people enjoyed it and some didn't but they were hardly great earth shattering topics, if they were we would have been swamped and it would have been impossible.
Memorandum! wrote:
>
> you're the person who suggested it wasn't worthy of a topic.
Arguing about threads being hi-jacked is pointless.
It'll happen regardless.
>
> you're the person who suggested it wasn't worthy of a topic.
Arguing about threads being hi-jacked is pointless.
It'll happen regardless.
I hope you all get banned anyway, except FFF and Neo - they rock my panty liners.
AbsoluT Neó wrote:
> Why don't we all just have an orgy and put an end to all this sexual
> tension in here?
You said what I was thinking.
My does all this tension arouse me.
> Why don't we all just have an orgy and put an end to all this sexual
> tension in here?
You said what I was thinking.
My does all this tension arouse me.
Memorandum! wrote:
> Every time you
> hijack a thread it ends up exactly the same - crap innuendo and sad
> online flirting.
Say what, Baby?
> Every time you
> hijack a thread it ends up exactly the same - crap innuendo and sad
> online flirting.
Say what, Baby?
English_Bloke wrote:
> Then why do you call me a fool?
Assuming that was for me? I've never called you a fool EB.
> Then why do you call me a fool?
Assuming that was for me? I've never called you a fool EB.
Page: