The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Get.
A.
Goddamn.
Room.
I don't appreciate coming on here to view your sexual innuendo filled posts and pathetic flirting attempts. We all know EB is a toyboy, Puddin' is a slapper, Flock's Professor Snape + a paedo and Ms NY is, well I dunno. Make something up yourselves.
You can rent them by the hour now, y'know.
A.
Goddamn.
Room.
I don't appreciate coming on here to view your sexual innuendo filled posts and pathetic flirting attempts. We all know EB is a toyboy, Puddin' is a slapper, Flock's Professor Snape + a paedo and Ms NY is, well I dunno. Make something up yourselves.
You can rent them by the hour now, y'know.
Page:
Memorandum! wrote:
> Flock wrote:
> Do the people who object have to read everything thats posted on
> this
> forum, surely after a couple of posts you have an idea of the tone,
> why not just stop reading at that point.
>
> Yeah, but people see a topic, want to pass comment on it, then find
> the thread is full of nonsense completely irrelevant to the title.
> If they try to say something remotely relevant to what the topic is
> actually supposed to be about their post just gets lost in a
> sea of unfunny drivel.
So..quote the first post and then make your comment.
> Flock wrote:
> Do the people who object have to read everything thats posted on
> this
> forum, surely after a couple of posts you have an idea of the tone,
> why not just stop reading at that point.
>
> Yeah, but people see a topic, want to pass comment on it, then find
> the thread is full of nonsense completely irrelevant to the title.
> If they try to say something remotely relevant to what the topic is
> actually supposed to be about their post just gets lost in a
> sea of unfunny drivel.
So..quote the first post and then make your comment.
gerrid wrote:
> There are two comments I wish to make:
>
> 1: Puddin, Flock (you are by far the worst offenders) people object
> to you because they make a thread about something, and then you just
> fill it up with your "i have a big rod" "ooh i
> know" "EB would know" internet flirting. This annoys
> people because it fills p potentially interesting topics with utterly
> pathetic dribble.
Potentially interesting topics
One by Crossbob about being asked to write something, now if we hadn't gone in that it would only have turned into another CB baiting topic which is worse.
The other asking about a dodgy msn account which was dead anyway.
These were not interesting topics and if they were people would have just restarted on the original subject once we'd finished.
> There are two comments I wish to make:
>
> 1: Puddin, Flock (you are by far the worst offenders) people object
> to you because they make a thread about something, and then you just
> fill it up with your "i have a big rod" "ooh i
> know" "EB would know" internet flirting. This annoys
> people because it fills p potentially interesting topics with utterly
> pathetic dribble.
Potentially interesting topics
One by Crossbob about being asked to write something, now if we hadn't gone in that it would only have turned into another CB baiting topic which is worse.
The other asking about a dodgy msn account which was dead anyway.
These were not interesting topics and if they were people would have just restarted on the original subject once we'd finished.
Memorandum! wrote:
>
> Yeah, but people see a topic, want to pass comment on it, then find
> the thread is full of nonsense completely irrelevant to the title.
> If they try to say something remotely relevant to what the topic is
> actually supposed to be about their post just gets lost in a
> sea of unfunny drivel.
Yep sometimes you've got to go with the flow.
If you're that desperate make a new topic to get it back on track. Once a thread diversifies it's usually lost.
>
> Yeah, but people see a topic, want to pass comment on it, then find
> the thread is full of nonsense completely irrelevant to the title.
> If they try to say something remotely relevant to what the topic is
> actually supposed to be about their post just gets lost in a
> sea of unfunny drivel.
Yep sometimes you've got to go with the flow.
If you're that desperate make a new topic to get it back on track. Once a thread diversifies it's usually lost.
No, I didn't know that. Pfft
Flock wrote:
> Puddin' wrote:
> and the other 'side' who understand this is General chat..the
> chat where anything goes..kinda like Fun House.
>
> I never liked Fun House.
Did you know Pat Sharp, the bloke who presented Fun House, was arrested and charged for paedophillia after he was caught in bed with a young boy?
True story. Saw it on the news a while back.
> Puddin' wrote:
> and the other 'side' who understand this is General chat..the
> chat where anything goes..kinda like Fun House.
>
> I never liked Fun House.
Did you know Pat Sharp, the bloke who presented Fun House, was arrested and charged for paedophillia after he was caught in bed with a young boy?
True story. Saw it on the news a while back.
Flock wrote:
> Do the people who object have to read everything thats posted on this
> forum, surely after a couple of posts you have an idea of the tone,
> why not just stop reading at that point.
Yeah, but people see a topic, want to pass comment on it, then find the thread is full of nonsense completely irrelevant to the title. If they try to say something remotely relevant to what the topic is actually supposed to be about their post just gets lost in a sea of unfunny drivel.
> Do the people who object have to read everything thats posted on this
> forum, surely after a couple of posts you have an idea of the tone,
> why not just stop reading at that point.
Yeah, but people see a topic, want to pass comment on it, then find the thread is full of nonsense completely irrelevant to the title. If they try to say something remotely relevant to what the topic is actually supposed to be about their post just gets lost in a sea of unfunny drivel.
I love this thread.
"You people suck for chatting and having fun on a chat forum!!!!!11111"
Yes lets all not post then there's nothing to disagree with...
"You people suck for chatting and having fun on a chat forum!!!!!11111"
Yes lets all not post then there's nothing to disagree with...
Who said that?
gerrid wrote:
> There are two comments I wish to make:
>
> 1: Puddin, Flock (you are by far the worst offenders) ...blah, blah,
> blah, yackity schmackity...
I like Flock, I think he does his flirting with a subtle sarcasm which often goes unnoticed and never fails to make me laugh.
> There are two comments I wish to make:
>
> 1: Puddin, Flock (you are by far the worst offenders) ...blah, blah,
> blah, yackity schmackity...
I like Flock, I think he does his flirting with a subtle sarcasm which often goes unnoticed and never fails to make me laugh.
Puddin' wrote:
> So, this topic is split into two 'sides'
>
> The 'side' who thinks that anything which they don't post is spam or
> crap etc etc etc
>
> and the other 'side' who understand this is General chat..the
> chat where anything goes..kinda like Fun House.
I never liked Fun House.
Do the people who object have to read everything thats posted on this forum, surely after a couple of posts you have an idea of the tone, why not just stop reading at that point. Whats so offensive about it anyway, it was done lightheartedly, no-one involved got offended, there are people on this forum who thought it was funny so whats the problem?
As for moving onto msn, it sort of doesn't work when the topic has started on the forum.
* Replying to Gerrid *
> So, this topic is split into two 'sides'
>
> The 'side' who thinks that anything which they don't post is spam or
> crap etc etc etc
>
> and the other 'side' who understand this is General chat..the
> chat where anything goes..kinda like Fun House.
I never liked Fun House.
Do the people who object have to read everything thats posted on this forum, surely after a couple of posts you have an idea of the tone, why not just stop reading at that point. Whats so offensive about it anyway, it was done lightheartedly, no-one involved got offended, there are people on this forum who thought it was funny so whats the problem?
As for moving onto msn, it sort of doesn't work when the topic has started on the forum.
* Replying to Gerrid *
Page: