The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Came to this conclusion after seeing the aforementioned users had many votes against them in that "Forum Enemy" thread.
Against this harsher climate with strict irritating staff and retarded people the sensible and decent users of old are dying out.
'Tis a pity.
> Oriental Rib wrote:
> So is >< equal to?
>
> No, you've just accidentally voted for Labour though.
I'm finding this exquisitely hilarious.
> So is >< equal to?
No, you've just accidentally voted for Labour though.
> So is >< equal to?
SHOCKINGLY, 'equal to' is " = "
> Memorandum! wrote:
> not equal to
>
>
> Same as?
>
> I was better at ye olde English.
>
>
> is greater than
> < is less than
>
>
> I think..
and <> is "not equal to"
Whatever.
I reckon that, although it's true that I prefer reading stuff by the 'proper' regulars, newbies aren't even given a chance. I now make a point of checking out any topic by someone I don't recognise, and possibly even dropping advice/encouragement.
Anyway, stop worrying about the past and embrace the future, many of 'you' were probably newbies at one point.
This is Jormungandr, signing off as Newbie Lawyer Supreme.
The opposition may now present their arguments.