Viewing Thread:
"Stop illegal immigrants"

Disgusting, it really is.


Original Message posted by ßulle†† Yesterday at 12.14PM Original Message
There are 27 replies
Drunk Illegal Immigrant, driving with no license or insurance, knocks down and kills a child and only gets..

8 weeks

And he's still in the Country, despite being here illegally.

Hurrah for justice.

After reading this post it made me want to know what you all think about illegal immigrants. I think it is wrong and because Britain used to be a strong dominating country should stand strong now and make sure no forign immigrants get into the UK. Look what what happens when they get in...

Pathetic attempt Light, you don't understand do you, you've been found out and now your trying to say you meant different? rubbish! If this is the case (which I know is not), then why did you say that you were one step ahead of me when I asked you why you think the system is "under control"? To me that sounds very much like you were talking about the system bieng "under control". So next time you try and dig you way out, at least have some lawyer skills to do it.


Christ, you havn't a clue do you, do you really think I didn't know there's controls in place? That has to be the dumbest thing i've ever heard, and you think i'm stupid! This is from the guy who thinks a system is "under control" because, well they make £2 billion profit ignoring all other factors involved, ignorant idiot.

The facts remain though, i've prooved that the system is not under control which is what my point was in the first place, and prooved my point about needing to tightning the immigration system, and finally also prooved that you don't have to be racist in doing so.

Sibs wrote:

>
> Erm, I didn't say I was friends with them, that whole first paragraph
> was pretty much just setting the scene if you will. Hell, there's
> loads of English people I pass on the way to lectures, just becuase I
> may understand a snippet of their conversation doesn't make me know
> them or like them any more or less...

I know, but in the context of what you were replying to, it gives the impression that you were stating that simply because you have foreigners in your flat you "got along" with them.

lcarus wrote:
> That's hardly the same as "best friends" though, is it.
> There were people of different countries last year, and
> "overhearing a conversation" that you couldn't understand
> isn't exactly implying that you're friends with them. If that were
> the case, everyone would be mates with everybody they've heard. In
> fact, again it merely sounds like tolerance rather than integration.

Erm, I didn't say I was friends with them, that whole first paragraph was pretty much just setting the scene if you will. Hell, there's loads of English people I pass on the way to lectures, just becuase I may understand a snippet of their conversation doesn't make me know them or like them any more or less...

I think he'd manage to get a grey shirt after mixing up the wash.

Heh. Or an Ernst Rohm...

Anyway, Mosely was a well educated and intelligent fascist. I'd place kevstar in the lower ranks of the blackshirts.

Hmmmm.

I think calling him 'Mr Mosely' would be good.

Short for "Lumpen Proletarian".

In this context, an insult with much meaning;

1. A reference to O'Brien in 1984, when he says "the proles are animals"
2. An insult referring to kevstar's clear lack of education and intelligence (which, under normal circumstances, is not something to insult over. But as kevstar is both stupid and hateful, it seemed apt)
3. It created the rather pleasing sound of "prole-hole" when referring to kevstar's doubtless stinking and lice-ridden home.
4. Finally, used repeatedly because I get a sadistic, smugly superior kick out of using an insult about him that he so clearly doesn't understand.


Hey, I never said I was a nice man....

What's a 'prole'?

In fairness to kevstar, he (deliberately) misquoted me from a much earlier point in the debate. And back then, I made a simple mistake; I assumed that he had a modicum of intellect. So I do take some of the blame for not making absolutely crystal clear that which anyone with half a brain would have understood (and, as confirmed by FFF and Goatboy, did understand)from the wording I used.

So then kevstar; now that your rather amusing attempt to halt the debate by use of the kind of squealing one would usually associate with a recently violated epileptic parrot, perhaps we can get back on topic.

Could you explain to me;

- Why your use of language (and I'm referring here to your insistence that it's not natural for people of different colours to mix) mirrors that of white supremecist organisations.

- Why you said that a non-white person couldn't be a british citizen because "...just look at him"?

- What you think, in your own words, the current system of immigration into the UK actually is.

- Just why you feel that facts from one report are only true if they indicate there is a problem with immigration, yet facts from that same report are completely unreliable if they indicate there is no problem with immigration.

- Why you're so deeply, meaningfully inferior to me in every conceivable way, y'great big ol' racist you.


I appreciate it may take you a while to answer those questions; doubtless you'll continue to insist that your misunderstanding of something fairly clear indicates that I'm lying. And I'm sure you'll do your utmost to behave like the kind of dull-witted prole who mistakes ignorance and insular thinking for common sense. But I'd be delighted if you showed otherwise.

Indeed.

I think, kevstar, you should stop trying to scream and shout and run back to mummy and get back to arguing your side. It may not make you look any less like an idiot, but it's much more enjoyable for the rest of us.