The "Freeola Customer Forum" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
Disgusting, it really is.
Original Message posted by ßulle†† Yesterday at 12.14PM Original Message
There are 27 replies
Drunk Illegal Immigrant, driving with no license or insurance, knocks down and kills a child and only gets..
8 weeks
And he's still in the Country, despite being here illegally.
Hurrah for justice.
After reading this post it made me want to know what you all think about illegal immigrants. I think it is wrong and because Britain used to be a strong dominating country should stand strong now and make sure no forign immigrants get into the UK. Look what what happens when they get in...
Original Message posted by ßulle†† Yesterday at 12.14PM Original Message
There are 27 replies
Drunk Illegal Immigrant, driving with no license or insurance, knocks down and kills a child and only gets..
8 weeks
And he's still in the Country, despite being here illegally.
Hurrah for justice.
After reading this post it made me want to know what you all think about illegal immigrants. I think it is wrong and because Britain used to be a strong dominating country should stand strong now and make sure no forign immigrants get into the UK. Look what what happens when they get in...
Page:
the nintendo section is realy cool
Goatboy wrote:
> "Academically intellectual"
>
> Clueless mindwrong ineffectual
Used to have that written on my police calling cards
> "Academically intellectual"
>
> Clueless mindwrong ineffectual
Used to have that written on my police calling cards
I would've replied sooner but it's taken me 20 minutes to stop laughing at the weakest white-boy rap I've seen since Lady Victoria Hervey released her record. And you still claim you're not a chav?
Deary me kevstar; just when I think you couldn't make yourself look any stupider...
Okay; what I'm saying, and have been saying since the beginning of this, is the following;
- There is insufficient evidence to say that either immigration is working, or it is not.
- Therefore we need to gather all of the evidence, pros and cons, to have an open and honest debate about it.
With me so far? Okay...
- You have been providing evidence that is against immigration.
- You have also been dismissing any pro-immigration evidence with the well thought out argument of "That's rubbish".
- You've even dismissed evidence you yourself have provided once it's pointed out to you that it is, in fact, in favour of immigration.
Still keeping up? What a good boy you are...
- On the basis of the anti-immigration evidence only, you've demanded that everyone admit that there is a problem with immigration and it should be addressed.
- I however have said that your anti-immigration evidence needs to be discussed along with the pro-immigration to come to an informed conclusion.
- You wailed "no it doesn't".
- By attempting to deny that any debate should take place, and by seeking to force your view as the only correct one, you have shown your narrow mindedness and bigotry.
So; that's the main bulk of your complaint answered. Do you see?
In addition:
- You have stated that it's "not natural" for people of different colours to mix (have you mentioned that to you sister?)
- You have stated that a coloured gentleman couldn't possible be a british citizen because "just look at him"
- You've used the same language used by White Supremicist organisations throughout the debate
- You misquoted me in order to try and make it seem like I was saying something I hadn't. Then, when that lie was exposed, you tried to ignore it altogether.
- You've failed to explain what your understanding of the current immigration system actually is, thus negating your insistence that "I know it isn't working".
- You've stated that it's possible to raise concerns about immigration without being racist. And it is. Unfortunately, you've also proved that you are, beyond much doubt, racist.
- You've made it abundantly clear that I'm so much better than you in every conceivable way.
And that pretty much covers it.
Seeing as I've answered every one of your mongtarded retorts, perhaps you'd be good enough to answer my questions now? Or will you "treat" us to some more of your rapping?
Incidentally kevstar, on what basis are you on long term sick? Cos it seems to me that, if you can spend this much time at your computer, and can spend all this time formulating an argument (poor though it is), you're more than capable of office work. I'm sure the DSS will think so.
Deary me kevstar; just when I think you couldn't make yourself look any stupider...
Okay; what I'm saying, and have been saying since the beginning of this, is the following;
- There is insufficient evidence to say that either immigration is working, or it is not.
- Therefore we need to gather all of the evidence, pros and cons, to have an open and honest debate about it.
With me so far? Okay...
- You have been providing evidence that is against immigration.
- You have also been dismissing any pro-immigration evidence with the well thought out argument of "That's rubbish".
- You've even dismissed evidence you yourself have provided once it's pointed out to you that it is, in fact, in favour of immigration.
Still keeping up? What a good boy you are...
- On the basis of the anti-immigration evidence only, you've demanded that everyone admit that there is a problem with immigration and it should be addressed.
- I however have said that your anti-immigration evidence needs to be discussed along with the pro-immigration to come to an informed conclusion.
- You wailed "no it doesn't".
- By attempting to deny that any debate should take place, and by seeking to force your view as the only correct one, you have shown your narrow mindedness and bigotry.
So; that's the main bulk of your complaint answered. Do you see?
In addition:
- You have stated that it's "not natural" for people of different colours to mix (have you mentioned that to you sister?)
- You have stated that a coloured gentleman couldn't possible be a british citizen because "just look at him"
- You've used the same language used by White Supremicist organisations throughout the debate
- You misquoted me in order to try and make it seem like I was saying something I hadn't. Then, when that lie was exposed, you tried to ignore it altogether.
- You've failed to explain what your understanding of the current immigration system actually is, thus negating your insistence that "I know it isn't working".
- You've stated that it's possible to raise concerns about immigration without being racist. And it is. Unfortunately, you've also proved that you are, beyond much doubt, racist.
- You've made it abundantly clear that I'm so much better than you in every conceivable way.
And that pretty much covers it.
Seeing as I've answered every one of your mongtarded retorts, perhaps you'd be good enough to answer my questions now? Or will you "treat" us to some more of your rapping?
Incidentally kevstar, on what basis are you on long term sick? Cos it seems to me that, if you can spend this much time at your computer, and can spend all this time formulating an argument (poor though it is), you're more than capable of office work. I'm sure the DSS will think so.
"Academically intellectual"
Clueless mindwrong ineffectual
Clueless mindwrong ineffectual
Ok, I know very little about immigration, but at least I'll admit it.
I do however know that this...
kevstar wrote:
> English_Bloke wrote:
> I want to see him say Light is not “academically intellectual” and
> rhyme that with something.
>
> Cos he knows he's bisexual
...Was pish-poor
I do however know that this...
kevstar wrote:
> English_Bloke wrote:
> I want to see him say Light is not “academically intellectual” and
> rhyme that with something.
>
> Cos he knows he's bisexual
...Was pish-poor
Explain! Or don't you know without lights help
Kevstar, you're sounding increasingly petulant and desperate. Give it up mate.
English_Bloke wrote:
> I want to see him say Light is not “academically intellectual” and
> rhyme that with something.
Cos he knows he's bisexual
> I want to see him say Light is not “academically intellectual” and
> rhyme that with something.
Cos he knows he's bisexual
Well, i've gave him link after link to show where and why immigration is not under control and he's just dismissed them all by saying $2 billion profit, so that makes it alright? And when he is in a corner and admits theres a problem, he still denies it's out of control! And when I finally give an example (my last two links I think) where he can't deny it, he comes out and says he meant theres controls instead of saying out of control. But we all know where he lied, cos I asked a simple question, what makes you think immigration is under control, he says he's already one step ahead and provides me with links from the home office to proove me wrong. He didn't mention that the link he showed was based on figures which were thought to be fiddled (the beverly hughes case confirms this, look it up), so he was again prooved wrong, just like everything else he's tried in vain to defend.
Sounds like the people I work with.
I just phoned up and spoke with the duty manager. I told them about how I was made to feel uncomfortable due to comments made about homosexuals and comments directed at people of certain races. What was the reaction?
"Yes, ok, thanks for letting us know. Will that be all?"
I just phoned up and spoke with the duty manager. I told them about how I was made to feel uncomfortable due to comments made about homosexuals and comments directed at people of certain races. What was the reaction?
"Yes, ok, thanks for letting us know. Will that be all?"
Page: