Viewing Thread:
"So Goldeneye: Rogue Agent is crap..."

Just in case you were in any doubt and was optimistic about EA's clear rip off here be the IGN review:

[URL]http://cube.ign.com/articles/568/568339p1.html[/URL]

Whitestripes DX wrote:
> pftt
>
> Best FPS goes like this:
>
> 1) Half-Life 2
> 2) Half-Life
> 3) Goldeneye 007

*nods*

They would probably be my 3. Discounting the Thief and Deus Ex series as they aren't pure FPS. Riddick would be up here but again this is a mixture of different genres, the same for System Shock.

Timesplitters is possibly the biggest joke of a series I have come across with one of the most pathetic single player attempts *cue cliché * ever.

Additionally, you're a ****ing moron if you have any Timesplitters game in the top 10.

pftt

Best FPS goes like this:

1) Half-Life 2
2) Half-Life
3) Goldeneye 007


I put SS2 with RPGs really.

did you ever expect much from a game that claims to be the successor to rares masterpiece , its just a desperate attempt at getting publisity calling it that m and it tarnishes the name goldeneye . now if they just ported the origional goldeneye to gc with online play , now thats what im after

ÂLŠ†ÂÎR wrote:
> gamecollector wrote:
> lol half life and ss are good games i admit, but not as good as
> halo
> 1+2 and timesplitters,
>
> Ahahahahahahh...

What, he's right.

Pffft, they just decided it would be a smart idea to advertise the fact that they publish it, as pretty much no-one knew they published the other ones.

Generals was the first Command and Conquer game with EA 'Games' pretty much in full control.

ÂLŠ†ÂÎR wrote:
> Whoever said Command and Conquer should be shot from point blank
> range.
>
> Westwood made the Command and Conquer series what it is, EA tried to
> take it mainstream by completely toning down the strategy and making
> it a hell of a lot easier.

Eh?

EA have owned Westwood ever since it was good.
In fact, I'm sure they've owned it since Tiberian Sun, at least - I sold my only copies of the game from before that, so I've no idea.

Tphi wrote:
> munn wrote:
> Technically then, though, it could still be good then?
>
> Eh. I read another few reviews after the IGN one.

Fair enough.
Did you do the same for the "Feel TheMagic" review?
They seemed to chrun out similar scores.

So, maybe IGN aren't so idiotic?

And Halo 1 and 2 arent better than Goldeneye and Perfect Dark. I dont see why Halo is so popular. Ive been playing it a few hours revently and its good, but everyone goes mad for it and its not that special. I just cant see it.