Viewing Thread:
"So Goldeneye: Rogue Agent is crap..."

Just in case you were in any doubt and was optimistic about EA's clear rip off here be the IGN review:

[URL]http://cube.ign.com/articles/568/568339p1.html[/URL]

Half-Life forgotten? Are you joking? The original, released in 1998, was still massive right up to the release of Hl2. There's a reason it won 50 Games of the Year awards and has had more mods made for it than there have been retarded comments on these forums.

Call of Duty is crap so I don't care.

Muuuuuuuuuuuuh.

If people are still playing it now, rather than these modern day equivalents you've stated, then it's obviously still better.

And a game made 7/8 years ago that is still being played is obviously a classic. Half Life will be forgotten in a few years (unless there are repeated sequels) and Call of Duty will be forgotten in months (true story).

Goldeneye isn't forgotten now, and probably won't be another few years down the line.


Fact: This kind of playability and longevity obviously means Goldeneye is superior.

what wrote:
> Aha - and now the terminology changes.

I never had a 'terminology'.

> But Call of Duty is the far far far superior game in all aspects.

Multiplayer, no. Replay value, no.

ÂLŠ†ÂÎR wrote:
> It's all comparitive and how good it was at the time

And that's what I'm saying - but others seem to think differently.
It's absurd that people think Goldeneye at present is a better game than the likes of CoD.

Aha - and now the terminology changes.

Goldeneye was more "special" now, was it?
I don't dispute that.

But Call of Duty is the far far far superior game in all aspects.

Call of Duty is excellent but it is no-where near as special as Golden Eye was in multi-player even years after release.

It's all comparitive and how good it was at the time. Golden Eye at the time was better than Call of Duty at the time of its release.

Ahaha what!

What's that got to do with anything at all?

Fact: Goldeneye 64 was good when it was released. But in comparison to FPS' of nowadays?
It pales into insignificance.

Hey, you, get off my cloud says:
will people be playing Half Life and Call of Duty in 2 years, let alone 8?

Hey, you, get off my cloud says:
no


Azul knows the AJ is correct here, but went to get his dinner (ahah, sure) and didn't reply.

AJ wins again.

I don't understand this whole "oh, it's an old classic, it was considered amazing when it was first released so it's better than any good games now" bullsh*t.

Anyone who looks me in the eye and says Goldeneye on the N64 or the original Half-Life is better than Call of Duty for example should be shot between the eyes.

Seriously.

I keep reading these posts about how Goldeneye is the best FPS ever and all this, but it really really isn't.

Around the era it was released? Perhaps yes.

But ffs - you can't possibly even joke that it's better than any modern acclaimed FPS.

munn wrote:
> Did you do the same for the "Feel The Magic" review?
> They seemed to chrun out similar scores.

I was much more suprised by Mario's score knowing what a game Mario 64 was.