The "General Games Chat" forum, which includes Retro Game Reviews, has been archived and is now read-only. You cannot post here or create a new thread or review on this forum.
This thread has been linked to the game 'Golden Eye : Rogue Agent'.
Just in case you were in any doubt and was optimistic about EA's clear rip off here be the IGN review:
[URL]http://cube.ign.com/articles/568/568339p1.html[/URL]
[URL]http://cube.ign.com/articles/568/568339p1.html[/URL]
Page:
Or it's a typo.
Yeh that's been an issue. But you'd think with the three methods of control one would be good, especially the thumb-strap way.
I certainly won't mind.
They didn'tseem to have any problems with it, maybe the DS is just a bit awkward to use.
Dunno.
They didn'tseem to have any problems with it, maybe the DS is just a bit awkward to use.
Dunno.
munn wrote:
> I was surprised too.
> The only reason I could fathom is ebcause it's just an updated
> "port"
> If you know what I mean.
If it's only being marked down for lack of new stuff then it really won't be bothering me one bit :) Ok, maybe more new stuff or a totally new game might have been preferable but realistically, who's going to mind playing through Mario 64 again in this new way?
> I was surprised too.
> The only reason I could fathom is ebcause it's just an updated
> "port"
> If you know what I mean.
If it's only being marked down for lack of new stuff then it really won't be bothering me one bit :) Ok, maybe more new stuff or a totally new game might have been preferable but realistically, who's going to mind playing through Mario 64 again in this new way?
And Azul's right.
Having never played Goldeneye until last yearish or so, I had no "nostalgic" views of it, and I was greatly disappointed by it.
It really is nothing special any more.
Half-life is overrated too.
In fact, most FPS's are overrated, but those two more than any other.
Having never played Goldeneye until last yearish or so, I had no "nostalgic" views of it, and I was greatly disappointed by it.
It really is nothing special any more.
Half-life is overrated too.
In fact, most FPS's are overrated, but those two more than any other.
Tphi wrote:
> munn wrote:
> Did you do the same for the "Feel The Magic" review?
> They seemed to chrun out similar scores.
>
> I was much more suprised by Mario's score knowing what a game Mario
> 64 was.
I was surprised too.
The only reason I could fathom is ebcause it's just an updated "port"
If you know what I mean.
> munn wrote:
> Did you do the same for the "Feel The Magic" review?
> They seemed to chrun out similar scores.
>
> I was much more suprised by Mario's score knowing what a game Mario
> 64 was.
I was surprised too.
The only reason I could fathom is ebcause it's just an updated "port"
If you know what I mean.
99% of statistics are made up you know.
Including that one :P
Including that one :P
Dringo wrote:
> Whitestripes DX wrote:
> Additionally, you're a ****ing moron if you have any Timesplitters
> game in the top 10.
>
> And you're a funking moron if you don't.
Percentage correct:
WS: 100%
Dringo: 0%
> Whitestripes DX wrote:
> Additionally, you're a ****ing moron if you have any Timesplitters
> game in the top 10.
>
> And you're a funking moron if you don't.
Percentage correct:
WS: 100%
Dringo: 0%
AfroJoe wrote:
> And a game made 7/8 years ago that is still being played is obviously
> a classic. Half Life will be forgotten in a few years (unless there
> are repeated sequels)
Half life was made 8 years ago and was talked about right up to the sequel.
> And a game made 7/8 years ago that is still being played is obviously
> a classic. Half Life will be forgotten in a few years (unless there
> are repeated sequels)
Half life was made 8 years ago and was talked about right up to the sequel.
Whitestripes DX wrote:
> Additionally, you're a ****ing moron if you have any Timesplitters
> game in the top 10.
And you're a funking moron if you don't.
> Additionally, you're a ****ing moron if you have any Timesplitters
> game in the top 10.
And you're a funking moron if you don't.
Page: